Search results

I'm in revision season, this is what I do in my periodic breaks...

Because I'm a rebel I'm still up muhahaha. Seriously, no need for the patronising tone. I don't have FM13 PC version, only iPad, and I can't be on SBT on iPad and FM13 on iPad at he same time can I? I used unfortunate vocabulary that is linked to FM, but nonetheless, I think my point...

They aren't though, 4-1-3-2 is not 4-4-2, it has a holding midfielder, and does not have '2 banks of 4'. 4-4-1-1 isn't fundamentally 4-4-2 is it? Look at the difference in our play when we moved from 4-4-1-1 to 4-4-2. Also, the CAM in a 4-4-1-1 creates natural triangles which 4-4-2 doesn't have.

Again, because we moved to 4-4-2, mixed with desperation to get an equaliser, we resorted to hooking it, because we couldn't play though the midfield because we lost fluidity because of the move to 4-4-2.

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/transfers/wolverhampton-wanderers-potential-summer-transfer-targets-2315797.html?action=gallery&ino=5 I also read somewhere else, that he became a 'key player' in whoever was manager 's side. He was also one of their better players last season...

I don't rate Elliot particularly highly, I think Clarke offers more as a player, nearly scored as well. If we look back to how we played that game, ask yourself this, would Elliott had been the right move? Bear this in mind, we became a lot more direct with lofted balls coming toward Clarke, who...

I thought I had made another mistake! I read my post 3 times to see if I had said he had been in poor form!

4-4-1-1 not 4-4-2.

Whenever they have won it, it has been with 5 at the back.

They played 4-1-3-2 not 4-4-2.

Seen that! I was bored so wanted to see what formations have been used by winning teams.

I said he was 'in form'!

Why? Clarke looked a handful when he came on. People are clinging on to Elliott's 28m too much!

I don't know why you chose to single out Barton, he didn't play well, but, none of the team played very well, did they? I think whoever would've played in the AMC role would've struggled simply because the distribution wasn't there. Barton's 'pussy headers' didn't do him any favours! But...

I agree he did cost us that game, but what I disagree with you on is what mistakes he made. Firstly, MR was right to select McG to start, it was his last game of his loan (and turned out to his last game for CCFC) but besides that, McG is top goal scorer in the league by 4 goals, in less...

I know he was played on the wing there though, that is wasted talent. He is no winger.

If we got promoted we would need: 2 wingers, possibly young lads to come through? A CM, if Doyle joins in Jan, we won't need one. LB, hopefully Adams, 1 or 2 CBs With a good manager, and momentum... Who knows what could happen ;)

Barton 3 goals, 1 assist. Fleck, our top assister, 6, with 2 goals. Both have had less games under MR to extend this. Barton was PNE's best player in the Championship. Fleck was on loan at Blackpool, I don't know how well he did... Both have been linked to prem clubs throughout...

No team has won the World Cup using 4-4-2. Just saying.

I remember saying "we better not lose to fucking Barnsley!" He'd be a decent signing, him and Bailey at CM probably.