Search results

You’re the only one who needs wiki for assistance. You clearly use it to fact check otherwise you wouldn’t keep bringing it up.

Juxtaposed your position already. No surprise.

I’m glad you acknowledge that they’re numerous.

I see Kent councils resilience report dismisses what the PM was claiming at PMQ this morning as does the yellowhammer report which also it seems doesn’t even work on the worse case scenario it works on a reasonable worse case scenario so the actual worse case scenario could be even worse.

Can you show me the part in any manifesto where it says that the opposition should agree to an election when Boris’ lies come home to roost?

Do you think you’ll remember Boris’ empty promises that you were clinging onto early yesterday as a cast iron promises?

You’ll welcome as second referendum then?

Gauke has just described the meeting with the PM and chief brexit negotiator yesterday and they asked about the proposal to replace the backstop and basically told we could tell you but we won’t. I’m reminded of Will Ferrell and John C Reilly in the Film Stepbrothers. I’ll just remind people...

Very sensible of them too.

Nicholas Soames was brilliant today in Parliament. Good to see he hasn’t lost his sense of humour.

I see there’s been another Tory rebel today.

Supposition then.

Why is it odd? How can he leave the next day? Why hasn’t Johnson done that already?

It seems that the EU has all but confirmed that they would extend article 50 to allow for a general election. Pass the Bill, extend article 50 call an election. No games, no tricks, just some clarity for a change.

I never said they couldn’t.

On your behalf yes. Otherwise you’d understand why your post was a contradiction in one sentence.

Yes I may have got that wrong. See how that works. Key word though is may. All political commentators always add that it’s untested in law. Even Emily Thornberry said last night that her understanding is that an election is called and it happens in line with the withdrawal bill (which is what I...

So what you actually mean is yes it is but it also includes an agreed contribution to the budget for the next 18 months. You’re just contradicting yourself there otherwise.

The very first point (and it is a point not a fact) it makes is factually incorrect. It says and I quote “What is on offer entails the United Kingdom agreeing to pay the European Union another £39bn, in return for 21 months or more of additional talks to see if a new partnership can be...

Yeah but his miming skills are awesome. So...