Search results

I ignored those attacks because they were bollocks. The way Nick runs this site is fine by me. Doesn't mean I can't disagree with what he posts... :)

And yet you continually have a go at posters who try to do this when SISU is the target. It's like when you espouse about wanting to respond to posters who post BS, yet when it's against CCC or whoever else, you don't, (or rarely) bother. You keep your crusade against the telegraph going ad...

So, you do engage in that bollocks then... ;)

What do you mean by that hill?

You know that CSF use a PR company? Oh, and believe that CCFC/SISU's articles aren't equally well "considered" before released ?? One way or another, it's most likely PR BS from both sides...

So you don't want both sides to be approached, as 1 sides response will have been written by a PR company? Make your mind up Nick

Must admit, I thought you were suggesting they do what Nick has suggested they do. approach both sides...

We are used to that "form" of words though OSB58, it seems a defacto standard

I agree with that, except I think they should have been asking them much longer ago than now, or the last 6 months,,,

I think Margaery Tyrell may be playing a game of her own here.... Her words to her brother in his cell do not fit with who she seems to be now. Something's afoot.. (as always with GOT) :)

Gas or charcoal? makes no difference to the flavour. gas is much easier to set up and get cooking. Charcoal is a pain in the ass. Ok if you're only doing 1 or 2 during the summer, but if you cook outside every few of nights or so, you'll soon make the switch.

Shh, quiet dong, you'll give the game away... ;) #CLAN (council lovers against Nick)

I use both those two as well. I think my issue is a plug in to firefox playing up, but, as it only happens on a couple of sites, can't be arsed to do anything about it.

Chris needs to stop shouting so much in the studio, but otherwise I enjoyed it. same pranks, but needs time for any chemistry to develop. Hopefully it will.

I've had the "script error" issue with firefox on a couple of sites, but they work fine in chrome.

A bit like the "rejection of all 17 points comment" eh chief? ;)

You sure you haven't drawn it out of scale for the Burges option?? ;)

Source??

Makes you wonder what they will do to CRFC if any deal for the Butts actually happens...

Why thanks very much Stu... ;)