Search results

I know, just realised my mistake, I was just browsing the thread about Bell and thought the comment was about Bell, I hold my hands up.

In a way I want Bradford so we can take a much bigger following, but, Bradford have been good in the cups. ... Whatever will be, will be.

My bad, I thought this was about Bell :facepalm: :pointlaugh: EDIT: I read your username and thought the thread was about David Bell! :facepalm:

I'll leave now and I might just make the game... ;)

Getting relegated weren't a bad thing for us, we've got rid of Cranie and Clingan, high earners who were shit, or just not worth the money they were on, and we've been able to get more players with equal, or better quality, the only place we'd have to improve is winger(s), a CB, a LB & possibly...

MR has improved the squad by making them fitter, Fleck looks a new player now, he's slimmer etc. Barton has played better under MR than AT, Edj didn't start under Thorn, whilst Malaga got sent to Nuneaton, Brown got told to fuck off, Hussey got dropped, Cody got dropped, Elliott didn't start...

Close this I thought it didn't post this thread...

Since AT got the sack, have we replaced him with a scout yet?

Since AT has left, have we actually replaced him with a scout?

Really? He was shit... Bump.

And the way your defending him is even more embarrassing, you have no facts that suggest his time here was a success? CJ, if AT did so well at CCFC, why hasn't he got a job yet? He's applied for pretty much every job that's been available, even got rejected by AFC Wimbledon.

Based on that definition, I think it's provocative because he knows that will get a reaction.

Especially Wood, great defender (for L1) but sometimes he just lumps it up in the air under no pressure and we lose possession (most of the time) and it's really frustrating. :mad:

Your letting a good conspiracy get in the way of facts. What you forgot; loss in revenue, so can't make up on investment.

I'm well aware what provocative means. :facepalm: A refusing to pay rent is really provocative, it's renegade, but the radio show was very provocative. But still, your opinion was very naive and provocative nonetheless - don't forget that!

Provocative: Causing provocation, esp. deliberately: "a provocative article". An opinion can be provocative, CJ has numerous provocative 'opinions' none of which seem to want to benefit CCFC! :mad:

I rate him, if Bailey isn't 100% I'd start CT4, if everyone is 100% I'd play Bailey and Thomas in the central midfield roles.

Overrated, when it was a rumour he was a late applicant (couldn't resist! :laugh: ) I was nervous he'd get appointed. Bit of tw@ for leaving whenever he can, I hope it backfires the disloyal c-unit.

I think Thorn may have been talking to his stomach there. ;)

Got my CCFC shirt for £20 before the Spurs game.