Search results

Yeah. Simms needs a partner and we have Sakamoto, Burroughs and Eccles who can all play RWB.

We need a LCB and a ST, the rest can wait.

Sure. But that doesn’t change the question: is it adding to the media landscape?

It is nationalised. That’s why you want it privatised.

Sorry should have said broadcast/news. Point is we don’t nationalise industries to make a profit but because they have social value.

No one owns a media company for business reasons, the state included. The question is does C4 add to the media landscape?

Butts

Or 7. Noticed it was “8 or 10” in the latest interview. Unless he’s counting two we’ve signed.

Assuming it’s as successful, sure. But we don’t own media companies for economic reasons. What’s your plan to pay the bills once you’ve sold off all your assets? Rishi Sunak OnlyFans?

Company A has big project Enlists Companies B, C, D… to do work on project. All of these add to GDP.

Sorry my Dutch translator is out of the country. It’ll just be standard podcast bollocks where they talk about whatever was on the internet three days ago.

Harsh on Nads

No worries. Family silver famously never runs out.

One where we had a RWB on the bench. We’re trying to get the team, we aren’t going to play people wildly out of position if we don’t have to.

Apart from when he already did of course. This is “we aren’t signing Sheaf” all over again.

Or the other side met them there…

What else do they need permission for? It’s not a use change.

Obviously Hamers squad number 38 is a reference to what’s stopping the deal 3 = free 8 = ate. He wants free food as part of the deal. Get it done Doug!!

Eh, good enough to start a paid newsletter.

I thought it was you hinting TC Too many ITKs these days…