Search results

Do we actually need the police as it is? Many abuse their powers as people have mentioned and their effectiveness can be limited, for example, a few houses round mine got broken into, including a bike taken from my garden, we know who did it, I seen them walk into their house (larger story to...

Could easily pick up some bargains for CCFC.

Good to hear, the cop should be wearing his collar number.

Well said.

Quite possibly.

Thorn played the hated diamond and Shaw the diamond v Brum and Crewe (first half) then from the 2nd Crewe, we played 4-4-fecking-2! You are seriously an imbecile, or didn't go to the games if you think we played 4-4-1-1 in our first 7 games.

Under MR, Baker + Sheff have had freedom, that 4-4-2 doesn't give you, not like they did under previous managers. I don't rate Elliott. I'm glad you're in the 4-5-1 'camp'.

I don't usually watch Good Morning. It had this guy on it, so it was a must-see. It also has Hollie Willoughby on it...

I think if you look at the players we've got, and try to suit it to a formation, I probably wouldn't have 4-4-2 in the top 3. We have the CMs to play 4-4-2 but not the wingers, our wingers like to cut in and aren't that good down the line, or taking a man on, they also aren't great at crossing...

I agree, we've lost more games at home playing 4-4-2 (lost 4 of 5) yet, some folk think that's the formation we should play at home? Facts and MR are on my side (or I'm on MR's side) so the whole argument is quite pointless to be honest.

I know they were quoted. We tried it v Shrewsbury, it failed. We don't have McG no more, so you can talk about playing 4-4-2 to with them upfront, but what's the point? It's not my 4-4-1-1 system, Robins' takes credit for that, it is a fact we've won more games when we haven't played 4-4-2...

No wonder the other Home Nations are in the shit! All the good Scottish managers out there and they get Gordon Strachan!

But you're the one saying he "might as well have" have resigned :facepalm Like all footballers, he was cheap talking.

We've lost more games at home playing 4-4-2 than playing the usual Robins' formation. Of which we've only lost 1 using 5 in midfield v Carlisle.

Why are you saying McG 'may as well have' resigned!? You're not making sense, he didn't resign, and is at Ipswich, long gone! V Shrews we played 4-4-2 but McG dropped deep to be the ball, it failed badly. Accept it. No offence, but you are an idiot, of course it fucking matters what...

Good questions asked. I think give it perhaps 1 game between J. Clarke and Baker, if Clarke under performs, drop him, he played well v Tottenham & PNE, Carlisle at fault for the goal, but I don't know if he actually played badly from then. I think Sheff's 'surge' is coming to an end, with...

You tried to make a point that Clarke needs a strike partner and posed the question of should we play 2 upfront, Scunny are down at the foot of the table, we are not. We really kicked on in November and December, playing 1 striker.

You say that, but who would be his partner? Elliott? Ball? Cody? Rod? Not good enough IMO. We should try and get another striker in, most likely a loan at this point in time. We've also played 2 strikers in a similar amount of games at home this season, didn't improve our form then...

We're not Scunthorpe.

What? He didn't resign and that is that. We did try it v Shrews, that's how we were going to play it. I think the formation we played in November and December is quite important, seeing as that was when we won the most games etc.