Search results

You understand the issue perfectly well Tony, its just more convenient to ignore it.

Because Micheal posts on here and SISU (as far we know) do not. Yawn... Close thread.

That really is all it deserves.

I can't imagine 'womble' speaks for all Wimbledon fans. I have an issue with the many CCFC fans who bully those who attend at Sixfields (of which I am not one) but think its fine to line the pockets of an owner who raped another club. Like I say, no problem if you go or you don't, no problem...

Oh do fuck off!

Percy, if I were going to discuss this at all, I'd like some Wimbledon fans around the table. No offence but what do you know?

Tell it to the Wimbledon fans

So why bother reading it all then? Or boring us all with your conclusion when you have already made up your mind and have nothing constructive to offer?

The MK equivalent then. Let me rephrase: Either you have a problem with giving a shitty faceless franchising owner your cash or you don't. Either way is fine by me but please... Make up your fucking mind.

Either you have a problem with giving SISU your cash or you don't. Either way is fine by me but please... Make up your fucking mind.

Really?

Moving back to the Ricoh and continuing litigation cannot both happen. Its one or the other. You know this, so why say it?

About 5000 hypocrites.

And then what will they do? Do you think they still believe that ACL are going to fold?

Because they meet on the 7th, you can't go changing meeting dates, that would be anarchy. Anyway, what's the rush right? :whistle:

They can do that anyway if they want to, but they very clearly don't. (and why would they?)

That's my point King, it will be part of the proposal, not given away before they sit down. It might be a pretty poor card but its just about the only one they have left.