Search results

Which we scored the 2nd playing 4-4-1-1... :facepalm:

How many times have we conceded 3 playing 4-4-1-1 :thinking about: As I've pointed out, we've lost more at home playing 4-4-2 anyway, I think some are being somewhat ignorant to this fact, much to my frustration. Some have said it doesn't matter about the formation, I beg to differ, this...

He looked like he was injured from about the 60th minute, I don't know why we risked him, isn't worth it in the 1st and with hindsight, even more so.

A question is, were we giving them more chances because we had less men in midfield!? I'd say yes. As much as I like Moussa, I rate him highly as a CAM/LM, he can't play CM in a 4-4-2, he is restricted and isn't great at tackling, whereas Bailey is a solid tackler and good on the ball.

Had we have played the 4-4-1-1 with the exact outcome, the same 4-4-2 advocates would be out saying we need 2 upfront, blah, blah, blah. Fact, the only one fact that actually matters, we lost, not only lost, but lost by the biggest margin this season. As I said, the writing is on the wall!

I might be a bit irrational because I'm incredibly pissed off and distraught, however, 3-0 is a 3-0, you don't concede 3 goals then feel sorry for yourself, if I were manager, I'd have 'locked them in the changing room' giving them the hairdryer. Think Ferguson wouldn't give it the hairdryer...

Even he missed goal scoring opportunities, Stevenage (A) was a pure example of this.

They kept a clean sheet, scored 3 goals, what positives can you take, our biggest home defeat of the season! Shrews was unjust, today we got made to look silly.

We. Conceded. Three. Fucking. Goals. We played better, but, we got hammered, unjust my arse. All of the defence were running around like headless chickens, in particular, Edj, he's a joke, he can fuck off, overrated.

What stat matters in a match. If it was 1-0 or even 2-0, I'd see where the OP was coming from, but we lost 3-0 and are probably out of the competition, it was embarrassing. They were better at converting chances so they deserve their lead. End of.

Case closed. Poor today, partly because we lacked a 'middle man', we resorted to crosses, problem is, we don't really have a good crosser, nor someone to get to them, we're better when we play through the middle than whipping in crosses. We weren't as good with possession because we had to...

You can't lose 3-0 and say it's unjust.

So he's a liability because he's too soft. Teams exploit that softness. He's shit, I've had enough.

Thorn would've said, I want him signed, if he didn't want him, he wouldn't have got him signed up.

I think this is more accurate.

This is a myth, most the games we get big crowds are against teams that should bet us! I seem to remember us winning 1-0 v Wolves in front of 28k 1 yer. I think today was part of the 4-4-2 curse, another home loss playing 4-4-2, by the way, has 'busted' another myth! So fucking pissed off!

Cancel his contract, fuck this. What a fucking joke Thorn is for signing this guy up for so long! :mad:

Strictly speaking, why do you 'need' 2 tickets for tonight, if it was such a 'need' for you, surely you would've got them when they came out!? :thinking about:

5-0 CCFC... I kid, 2-1 I think.

If you really want a ticket, you're going to have to pay more than face value (£5) because other schmucks will. Should've got your ticket earlier.