Search results

At the moment the quietest area of the ground is ..... errr .... the ground. Basically just choose anywhere.

Who's Ian Neale? He's not that daft lump who keeps ringing CWR is he? :o:o

Therefore we won't miss him. AT seems most reluctant to play him in his rightful position.

I recall Juke's headers for sure. Poor efforts to be honest. The chance through on the keeper was on 77 mins. Would say that was a half-chance to be fair. He wasn't directly on goal. Missed Platt's one. I couldn't stomach anymore at that point and had left. Do think it's wrong AT saying he...

Not. In the last 11 seasons only four clubs have had 13 points or less from their first 20 games. All were relegated. It's okay though because John Clarke thinks we will turn it around and survive. :facepalm::facepalm: The 4 clubs were Brighton Stockport Rotherham Southend Nice to...

And what's all this about? "Speaking to Sky Blue Player, Thorn said: "It was one of those games which we seem to be getting each week as I don't know how we didn't score." To my mind we had that one clear cut chance and that was of Wood's in the first half. Besides that we hardly threatened.

He needs to go, one way or the other. Still scratching my head as to why he played a goalscoring, attacking midfielder in the holding roll just in front of the back four. :facepalm: Another mistake to add to the ever increasing catalogue unfortunately.

I don't expect a comeback. Thing is, the way we set our stall, it is always about a comeback. Why should it be a comeback? Let's go and attack teams from the off. Whatever we are doing now isn't working. It's really dull to watch now too. At least if we were throwing a few more bodies forwards...

Twas 12,652.

I always have CWR on, on the radio while I am watching the game so got to know very early on.

Last 20? More like last 10-12. Point is, yet again, if we had thrown more bodies forwards earlier we may have had a chance. When the likes of Rochdale play Southampton in the cup do they not attack because Southampton are the better side with better players? Course they do. We are too cautious...

That was daft. Assumed that Bigi would come on and Gardner would push forwards. Silly me and my common sense logic. :facepalm:

You know what would be good? For us to all cheer everytime we cross the half-way line.

Doesn't matter. Sorry, but what the hell has that got to do with anything? Not expecting five goals. not expecting 4 goals, or 3 goals. Just for us to attack teams. Maybe that way we will score more than an average of less than one goal a game.

Not being funny, but why after all the publicity and getting people onboard with the Southampton game are we now trying to target a different match? This is going to end up in a big mess and we're all going to look very silly. Someone soon is going to choose another game too. We need to...

You know what I would have done today if I was AT? I would have kept telling KD he had to warm-up and send him out with the subs.

And we can't be having that can we.

I know, but if any City fans go to any game in the next few it will be this one. For that reason, I'm out.

Playing Gardner in the holding role was pure madness. The lad is an attacking midfielder who scores goals. Guess what we are lacking in this team? That's right, an attacking midfielder who scores goals.

We simply do not attack teams. One thing that drives me crazy about AT. And before anyone says we don't have attacking players we have; Baker, McShuff McDonald Juke Platt Gardner