Search results

we just had to suffer because they couldn't behave themselves

aye, they're a proper bunch of twats

keep telling yourself that

Do people really still think it was onside? It was off, the argument you should be having is was it off be enough to justify VAR involvement but in the current system where the question is a binary onside or offside the call was right.

There's 3 bars serving 4 blocks in the corner, not had to queue this year and we sing ;) Anyway, 3-1 to us as they are pretty gash.

and seemed shocked at the time we excepted a bid. Yeah they proper stole him.

still trying to tell yourself this? my mates in that stand want back in the corner

Only if you believe folk on here.

Surely the point is he's had gone great game, let's see how he is over a season as he appears to have scored 1 goal in his other 11 games this season. He was wank for Celtic as well.

no, as people have said teh weakness is depth in CM

But what if he is hurt but can continue after treatment? Why should a tea be forced to sub him? Once again nah, it's a shit idea. It's simpler to just stop players going over to the bench in droves.

So if the keeper is genuinely hurt there team would then have to play sans keeper for 30 seconds? Nah

Also their cart horse of a cb elbowed in the head Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

Studs up in the follow through, fuck em they lost Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

yeah but we signed him as a cb, we also signed saka and mve that window

You can argue that Lati is our best cb at defending

dirty c**t

it's a yellow, he gets him high with the follow through

Shocked the Huddersfield players didn't make more of that

That's true, they listed them and one of them is actually Wilson-Esbrand