Search results

But Bell has been missing for 6 games and as far as I'm aware has had no match practice in any reserve game. Can't see how we could have picked him today, not even for the bench. I am guessing Thomas is injured too as he seems to have simply disappeared.

Do we go all out for the win thinking we need to make up the points sharpish, or would you be happy with us setting our stall out not to lose and a point being a point gained? I just say now what the fook and let's just go all out for the win. If we lose 4-0 we lose 4-0. A draw just puts...

I'm pretty sure Sky Blue Sam will be staying, but in line with all the cuts, next season he is going to be slimmer.

I'm pretty sure the can is injured too.

I suppose he could have poked them both with a stick and discovered which cried out in pain the loudest. The one who cried the least could have been chosen to start then.

Well it does matter. I have given Thorn plenty of stick ..... when he has deserved it. Today he is getting loads of stick and flak and there was pretty much next to nothing he could have done to change things. The word was before the game that we had 4 players injured and doubtful for...

Will you now change your Thorn rating based on what we now know? Or would you still have liked to have taken the injured Platt off and replaced him with the just as injured Nimely?

I think a few people have made themselves look rather silly today with their "Nimely should played," "Platt shouldn't have played," "Why the fook did he take Cody off?" "Nimely should have come on earlier" comments. Hopefully now after hearing AT's post match interview explaining everything...

Think the simple facts are that we need the following to happen on Saturday. City win Bristol loss. We could feasibly draw as long as Bristol lose their next two games.

How on earth can you say we weren't undone by a thin sqaud today, Paxman? Seems so clearly apparent that this was the case.