Search results

you can't also be offside if a defender tries to head it clear and heads it into the back of his own player

it rebounds off the 20 after the norwich player heads it clear the striker can not be offside as the norwich number 3 plays the ball on purpose, the deflection part of Law 11 applies to deflections off defenders when the attacking team have played the ball there is not a world a player can be...

i've posted a video showing him that

1:02 - he's received it from a rebound of an oxford player heading it on to his own player

that would be great if an oxford player touched the ball, please note the word team mate as we have established you can not be offside from a throw in so another oxford player would need to be the "team mate" who touches or plays the ball that doesn't matter though as the norwich number 3...

ffs you can not be offside from a throw no other oxford player touches the ball the norwich number 3 plays the ball on purpose creating a new phase of play it hits the back of the norwich 20 and falls to the striker it's onside, no one else including norwich think it was offside but crack on mate

it can't as he as he is wrong and the video is in this thread

the only oxford player near the ball is the 47 and he doesn't touch it so the only 2 oxford players who touch it are the throw in taker and the scorer i have posted the video if you want to watch it against and refresh your memory

i did and it was nonsense as it's the norwich number 3 that heads it against the number 20 i've posted the video if you want to watch again

https://www.skysports.com/football/video/30998/13323826/norwich-city-1-1-oxford-united-championship-highlights 1:03 Long throw and the Norwich number 3 heads it on to the back of the norwich number 20?

it was a long throw wasn't it? then it hit norwich defender who headed it on to the back of his teammate and then it went to the goal scorer you can't be offside from a throw so unless i missed something where is the oxford touch to make it offside?

he blew up after about 6 minutes, not sure where the BBC got 8 minutes from

This a WUM? He's a 33 year winger/forward who came on quite late in the game

We turn up and play anything like we can then we win easily

it's boosh, he can't help but throw in a bit of wum in to his posts

Did they? They just put the the rails in didn't they?

No

Edge Lord Squared

That wasn't your argument though, you were claiming Sky would make a unilateral decision to increase the amount of games live on TV despite there being a locked in contract and their being no economic benefit for them to do so. You are just WUM ain't you.

and play EMC and Saka central? No