Search results

Should be advertised better. Particularly when the purpose of the game is to help to keep Kettering in business. Out of interest - is anyone likely to go?

If the tax bill is genuinely that high then I can't see how even a club the size of Rangers can come out of this.

That will be under serious threat this year even though we play more games in this league.

I genuinely think every home game in this league is winnable. Even for us!

Revised team, if Cameron is still out: Murphy Christie - Keogh - Cranie - Clarke Deegan Norwood - Baker McSheffrey Platt - Nimely Subs: Dunn, Willis, Bell, Bigirimana, Eastwood

Wasn't sure tbh. If that is the case Clarke will have to play. We are really down to bare bones in defence. Wonder if there is a clause to call McPake back?

Agree with this article. Why would the guy who has pumped money into a club have it called in on his death. The only potential reason this would happen is that he hasn't made provision in his will for this money and his family ask for the money back immediately.

Been on Bristol City's forum to have a read. No mention of potential admin on there. In fact, quite the opposite. Sounds like they have a wealthy benefactor. Any basis for the Bristol City admin rumours?

So why bother buying it?

Murphy Christie - Keogh - Cameron - Cranie Deegan Norwood - Baker McSheffrey Platt - Nimely Subs: Dunn, Clarke, Bell, Bigirimana, Eastwood Cranie at left back to try to keep control of Snodgrass.

Don't think it's meant to be a 4-4-2 with wingers. More likely the usual diamond formation. What is the alternative to Clarke?

And rent on the food/drink outlets.

How do you come to that conclusion? You cannot lease half the stadium at the same price as 50% and if you own 50% surely you would be due 50% of any profit.

We would still manage to get ourselves relegated. And I can't see Forest & Bristol City going into admin.

I see a high scoring game with us being narrowly beaten. 85 minutes 3-1 Coventry 90 minutes 4-3 Leeds :-)

Have to agree with you. Scottish football is crap and inconsequential at best. I do think there is a bigger issue though with clubs across Europe spending well beyond their means. That includes CCFC in the past (and even now to a certain extent)

Gardner?????????

Any takeover takes time to negotiate. The seller (SISU) aren't desperate to sell so want the best (highest) price possible. The buyer obviously wants the lowest price possible. These things can take months to go through in any business.

We are not 100% down until it is mathematically impossible to stay up.

They may have been able to provide proof of funds, etc.. First sign it would be in the right hands is potential new owners recognising the club need to own the stadium to be viable. No reason they couldn't agree a deal in principal with certain conditions (i.e. owning the club)