Search results

they can't, not without either a constitutional convention or over 2/3s of states and legislators agreeing to change anything they would need democrat backing

interestingly there's not an actual "fixed" amount of SC judges so you may as they get younger see the amount change with every new part in power

yeah but over constitutional issues they don't always vote the way you think they will that the case that brought this over birth right citizenship, it is clearly defined in the constitution that all people born (outside of some things such as to foreign diplomats) are automatically us citizens...

The SC would then decide, it's what it is there for.

The courts can still block state wide or so it seems to read The actual case at hand over birth right citizenship is actually likely to be struck down by the SC anyway as it is clearly against the constitution and so my so even they can't fudge it,

anyway, as stated happy to see him sign for anyone as long as we get our cut

Wasn't the the issue that the club need to sell him but his move to Saudi fell through after the club asked for more and then he said no to a move to Chelsea.

It's got to though. If there are other options who aren't threatening to go on strike and these options have scored more goals in better leagues and/or are a lot younger they look more appealing. He was an idiot for believing a club would let him go cheaply without trying to extract maximum...

I wonder how much his behaviour recently will make other clubs think "if he is going to act like that, what may happen if he gets upset here?" and then look again at Isak, Sesko, Omishen?

will still sell loads and a make a fortune

if you say so

is that because they have to offer them a new seat for cup games? Could be the numbers need for that?

not sure how that helps as the claim is always that it's outside the d and unless the lino is 25ft tall he isn't going to be able to judge this

a) Because part of my family are Mancs (east M'cr blues though) b( Sorry, that should say doesn't

ok, if you say so

he'll be made up nice pay off, doesn't have to work in leicester and he'll likely get another go at management as people will think "yeah but that was at leicester"

that is nonsense by the way, they didn't want to pull out the fa cup but were basically forced to by the fa and a government who wanted to get the world cup to england and thought united playing there would help

anyway moving on from weird names for teams, peoples illogical hatred and SBT's weird and creepy obsession with me it does look like Vik is currently a lot of peoples 2nd choices United want Mbuemo, Arsenal Sesko and Liverpool seem to want Isak I don't really care where he goes, just be nice...

yep, much like "i'm not racist but" is usually followed by racism "manure" or "liverscum" is usually followed by drivel

ok, it is pretty sad though