Search results

No, Grimes doesn't miss any games and he isn't any good in the role that sheaf is playing. When Grimes and Torp are available he wasn't going to start, to pretend otherwise is fucking weird mate. He was at this stage firmly a back up to Grimes.

no, he wouldn't

Lampard obviously doesn't trust or fancy Rapha

No he wouldn't

I'd recall him just because of that.

We can't sign any loans until Jan

they can announce whenever, it has to be completed and registered in time though

He says it's not a "starter"

Be shocked if we have sold a first XI player, the money needed to do so would of at least meant someone would have picked up and reported something

yeah, could still just Woolfenden but seems weird to leave the obvious one this late we'll see

i thought that but united have just announced loaning them a lb

that's my Saturday game during the international break

why? even turner says we have been trying to sign others

it's in the league table

but he is back up in our squad as he's not as good as someone else who plays in his role

Back up because he plays in a role where we have a better player who over his whole 10 year odd career has hardly missed any football.o yes back up as Grimes doesn't need to be rotated in and out.

It could be worse, could be Wednesday who look like they have had their transfers today vetoed by the EFL

i get what you mean

To be fair they are our 4th and 5th choices

We're one back up midfielder down.