Search results

Acl 10% - purely for the original rent agreement, since the argument kicked off I would say 0% Council 10% in being uncooperative to sell and not handling the situation well. Sisu 80% for their underhanded tactics and not listening to fans wishes.

So why don't Sisu call their bluff and take the offer?

So your saying contractual agreements should change every time a business changes ownership?

I think they would have a strong case against the league. Personally I dont understand why they haven't done this rather than go after Northampton.

How's your statue for Seppala campaign coming along?

Im just curious as to which of her achievements you think deserves a statue?

Deserves a statue! Im sorry, but any idea that your a serious poster has just gone out the window.

I wish that was her, at least we would know what the woman described as a liar in a court of law looks like.

Why does it matter about buying the Ricoh now, Sisu are going to build us a new ground remember..... Sisu should except the offer and play at the Ricoh until Fishers new shed is built. Unless, lets say this is all about trying to send ACL under, then what is the problem?

At least it will be close to the action, just a 5 lane speedway track between fans and the players. Should make a good intimidating atmosphere. I don't understand some people, the few faults the Ricoh does have will be further exaggerated in Fishers shed. Main criticisms of the Ricoh being...

Acl used their profits in investing in its future and paying off its financial obligations as legally required. Perhaps if CCFC had followed ACL's prudent business model the club wouldn't be in the mess its in now? I fail to see where ACL have made this great mess up as you say. I find it sad...

Basically the guy just wants to bury his head in the sand. Selfishness is the term I would use.

Agree. Its the self appointed moral superiority of these sorts of posts that really winds me up. Right now we have Joy, Tim & 300 Northampton Sky Blue fans who are in support of Sisu and this plan. On the other hand we have 19k (average crowds prior to sisu taking over) that will not go and...

So Sisu's actions aren't damaging to the fanbase? We are the club, and they are destroying our support through their actions of ignoring the supporters wishes.

So you support the restriction of income by moving to a ground that would never have been big enough for us at anytime in our history? Do you even understand how FFP works?

You mean the project that has taken 20 years to get planning permission for?

Perhaps its a case of Northampton aiding the club in breaking the contract? Obviously the Northampton fans dont deserve this, but their chairman deserves all he gets. He knew he was getting involved in this murky world when he let sisu in.

No more strange than a business in administration finding 100k to pay for a judicial review.

Would have thought they would have a better chance going after the football league.

I know someone who works for the club (not particularly high up) and is a fan. They did consider resigning but then they thought they might as well keep getting the money, its costing sisu anyway.