Search results

Clear and obvious would be something you could see instantaneously. You would look and see a player is clearly ahead of another.. Very simple really. I don't believe my argument goes against me at all. If you look at a replay and you have to study it for 4 or 5 mins, that's not a clear and...

Exactly.

But factual to what degree? How far do you go with it. With handballs for possible penalties, they could go into even closer detail if they wanted to see how many millimetres an arm is away from a body, to show it's in an unnatural position. They could take 10 mins over if if they wanted to get...

Agree. It's nuts.

I like VAR, but it can't come down to a toenail. They should have looked at that and said "no clear and obvious error." And I would have said exactly the same if that had been Man U and not us. 100%. You can't bring It down to that level of microscopic judgement. It's ridiculous. If it's...

I reckon if he had cut his toenails before the game, it would have been on.

Small margins innit

Why didn't Godden take it? Oh well. Still very proud

Well done City anyway

What an awful penalty

That was awful

Why not Godden?

Ohhh

Oh no Expect lots of COH id a c*nt if he misses

Nope. It's pens. Anything can happen

In my world, Wright was in his own half.

What a shame.

I will return to this if he makes the match winning penalty. I do think we can do better, but he's not a terrible keeper and would be fine as back up

Nope, because he's shite. Get with the programme