Search results

I think that that is the pattern.

Hats off to Thorn?

It seemed to be his company when he was promoting it.. http://www.director.co.uk/MAGAZINE/2006/10%20Oct/footone_60_3.html

You're a very strange man. Lies, lies, lies, infamy,infamy, they've all got it in for me. Wouldn't ever want you hidden, like to see you squirm, and lobve the way you make up facts to try and suit your "arguments", then disappear for a bit when it's pointed out that it's untrue. You haven't...

I expect that it was probably dropped when he "resigned", though don't recall seeing any denials anywhere.

You really don't look very hard, or just keep your eyes shut don't you? http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/mar/02/football-league-cardiff-city-mortgage Strangely, not long after the Football League started investigating him, he resigned. Just another hedge-fund wanker like Sisu.

Yes, but your friend bought it, and you pay as and when you go to a game. So i am correct in saying that you haven't paid for your own season ticket. Think you explained in a hugely long, convoluted post when trying to justify your back-peddlling from your "Never going to watch City" again...

That backing would be withdrawn from anybody if incurrinng huge losses and the strategy not working. The greater the losses, the worse the team performed, the more he paid himself. Do you think that loaning a Championship rival money to buy players was a good strategy? The Football League...

Do you actually read anything about him at all? Could have taken as much money as he liked if we'd been successful, but typical of the modern type of businnesman who gets rewarded regardless of how bad they do. Don't know about the worlds smallest moustache, but you have the World's biggest...

Fairplay to the guy? He was supposed to be looking after the club he was Chairman of? Not screw that club for every penny he could, and loan money to our rivals to but players? And you want him back too! Fucking unbelievable.

How about his financial dealings? You always seem to avoid confronting those.

That went well! Only ourselves to blame, all the idiots singing sign him up, think he ended up at Tamworth after us.

Never mentioned it at the time, but to make him look good and deflect attention for the easily distracted however it worked a treat.

Who's your credible source? Ranson??

But didn't Coleman have better resources?

With his enhanced managerial ability it shouldn't really make a diference.

Certainly a worthwhile strategy to employ with Ginetta, if he's ever right about anything, it will be the first time.

Plausible?? Like being "debt free"?

Because it's so laughable? We could maybe have afforded them if Ranson hadn't been taking all our money, or if even he'd loaned £3.5 million to us to buy players, instead of one of our Championship rivals whilst being Chairman? Still his claims did the job, deflected the attention from him...

Doing so well?? We were never going to sign them, just balls from Ranson.