Search results

2005-06???

Is that opinion or fact?

Is that opinion or fact?

Im not having my council tax money going to some daft cow who cant run a hedge fund properly.

So your agreeing with me that the council should treat CCFC like any other business in the city?

You mean CCFC and ACL conspired against Yorkshire Bank's financial interest? That's illegal according to Mark Labovitch. Your accusing CCFC of illegal activity?

The finances of Coventry city fc are not the responsibility of the council. End of.

The council offered lower rent 3 to 4 times. What else should they have done?

As I've said a million times on this thread already people are entitled to their own opinion. However this myth that all sides are responsible (presented as fact, not opinion) is alienating the majority who will simply walk away.

The normal suspects round on a majority viewpoint yet again. Sums up perfectly what I was daring to suggest.

No it didnt

Sisu's first game in charge: 19.5k spectators. Most recent "home" game: 1.5k spectators.

That's not what I'm saying at all, and I suspect you know it. What I am saying is this constant accusation of bias against anyone who dares to hold sisu solely responsible, the constant defence of sixfields attendees against anyone who dares to suggest that they aren't all loving Mother Teresa...

Im just telling you what is happening. I don't care if you or anyone else disagrees with me or not. The majority are cheesed off at not having their opinions heard, or when they are heard several posters try to rubbish and belittle their ideas (see the final bit of your post).

Anyway, this thread has gone off track. fundamentals are, if you want to keep criticising those you don't apportion blame out to the world and its mother, if you keep harping on about the rights of the minority over the majority, if you want to go after a minor player in this whole mess, then...

Sisu are ultimately responsible for the welfare of this club. No one else.

It is as simple as that. Some of you just seem to want to go off on a pseudo intellectual tangent and try to make out how reasonable you are.

Yes that is what I'm saying. Other parties have no responsibility to ccfc or its fans. What it seems like to me is trying to find fault with other parties to justify sisus disgusting behavior.

But does it matter? Only one organisation owns ccfc, and as such only one organisation has a responsibility to ccfc and it's supporters.

Such as during judicial reviews?