Search results

Well that's interesting as the other day Grendel was once again attacking the council. I asked Grendel to forget about all that has gone on in the past and just say what he would like the council to do/offer to get our club back. He was unable to answer it.

Do you honestly believe that applies to Grendel? And to a lesser extent Torch? Two very bitter and twisted individuals who seem to fantasise over the demise of Coventry City Council and who appear to want Sisu to "beat" CCC regardless of the consequences.

A few Sixfielders keep going on about this points deduction this season, so let me explain again: IT MADE NO DIFFERENCE. We are a league 1 club now, and we would have been without the deduction.

Labovitch will blame the modalities of bank transfer mechanics.

"Daddy always said beautiful women were the most dangerous" - JR Ewing.

Yeah your right. More like 8,000 now thanks to Sisu's most excellent customer retention department.

Or they could have just told Appleton that they will only award the GS to one of the other bidders.

Sorry, I didn't realise only the great sisu could do that.

Well they gave it to someone just like that last August did they not?

Those generic, bland, emotionless faces. All just carrying out the wishes of one person, and ignoring the wishes of the majority that they have control over. Kind of reminds me of this picture.

As for what deals existed between other clubs and their councils is irrelevant. None of those clubs played at a ground comparable to the Ricoh. You just carry on with your bitterness against CCC. Its good Sisu are also following your lead in anti council bile. Its clearly the best, most...

No no your completely wrong. Chicken Balti pies and disgusting dried up sausage rolls will fund our Champions League campaign. It doesn't matter that the owners will spend all the revenue on crap players and loan interest.

So what's your solution then. What would you like to see the council do? Remember the council cannot offer the unencumbered freehold. Without going on about what has happened in the past, what offer do you think the council can realistically offer that would be acceptable to sisu?

Here you go: Forest Wolves Man City Leeds Utd Ipswich Barnsley Swansea Hull Peterborough Swindon Walsall Crawley Fleetwood Bradford Plymouth Hartlepool Northampton Torquay

Well we don't really have any evidence of that do we? What is clear many clubs do not own their ground, and it doesn't seem to be an issue for them.

Eh the 10 point deduction had no bearing on our league 1 status. How would you say the deduction affected the club?

From the point of view of the club I am saying exactly that. The club needs revenues, no one denies that. However ownership is not needed for that. As I've said before, its sisu that need to own the ground, not the club. The club just needs the revenue. Molineux is on a very long lease...

So your saying its not all about stadium ownership?? (playing devils advocate slightly here ;))