Search results

Obviously just trying to get a rise out of the callers to create debate. Basically he was saying it shouldn't be allowed and the rules should be changed but the rules as they are now at the moment allow and encourage diving and if a player can gain an advantage for there team, then they should...

I've done the math on that and statistically we only need to win one match between now and the end of the season for Mowbray to maintain a higher win % than Pressley come the end of the season

Reid said recently he agreed to sell Davenport on the basis it was reinvested. We brought in John, Reid had also lined up Steven Hunt (before his move to Reading), Kevin Doyle and Mackay but they all fell through as the money wasn't available any more.

If the players hasn't been paid I'm pretty sure we would have heard about it. Don't the Pfa normally make announcements when that sort of thing happens? I know when Bolton an Northampton weren't getting paid ( or in danger of not being paid) it was plastered all over the media.

We weren't awful just very average and flat

He fucked up with some in January, but January is never the easiest time to sign players as we know. We needed players and the pool of players you can sign from in January is massively limited to the players which would be available in the summer. I'd still be happy for him to have another...

Who do we reckon will be offered deals then? Sambou and who else?

RCC 7 Ricketts 5 Stephens 6 Cargill 6 Stokes 5 Vincelot 6 Fleck 5 Maddison 5 Cole 5 Lameiras 5 Armstrong 5 Fortune 4 Murphy 5 Lorentzton 5

I'd like to see more of a 4-3-3 --------RCC Ricketts--Stephens--Cargill--Stokes (Or what ever your preferred back 4 is) -------------Vincelot -------Rose-----------Fleck --------Armstrong--Murphy -------------Henderson-- Get the extra legs in midfield in Rose Have a big unit in...

Not horrible at all, I just have my reservations and believe further questions need answering as parts of the idea Anderson proposed still don't quite add up. I'm also sceptical as as to whether it is there genuine intention or another misdirect given that only days before Sepalla said almost...

What was the point of bringing Henderson in, only to then turn to Fortune when we needed a goal.

Why, just because Anderson said it? You are far too easy to convince.

I didn't have a problem with Pressley protecting or putting an arm round players as such. What wound me up is when he would try and tell us we played well when we were dog shit.

But have they really come round to your argument though? Or were they just talking shit to temporarily appease people like yourself, which you seem to have lapped up with no questions asked like you usually do when someone says something you like.

Not always, you see a lot of managers go into a job and do very well initially with players they inherited and then struggle in the following seasons. Pressley was fortunate in that way to follow a relatively successfully manager in Robins who had also put together a decent squad for Pressley to...

Don't need to The squad Pressley performed well in the first half of Sixfields was 100% inherited from the previous manager The squad Mowbray has performed well first half of the season with was almost entirely put together by himself and Venus in one transfer window. Mowbray is not getting...

Agreed on G Thomas, should surely be getting a chance ahead of Fortune and Tudgay. Would also add in even probably Sambou should be getting minutes ahead of Fortune. Mowbray seems to have become obsessed with having more experience in the side since December and its backfired and made the team...

Even if it is only him that's still one more than most of the time today.

Feels that way, but it isn't over yet.

Please go away G, I know you crave attention by trying to be controversial but bore off. Mowbray has already proven himself to be a much better manager than SP, going pear shaped at the moment but needs to be given another transfer window in the summer.