Search results

Looking at the table I would expect Colchester to beat Swindon. Swindon have absolutely nothing to play for, and would be sensible to rest their best players in anticipation of the play offs.

Not necessarily, Colchester can still overtake us. Colchester win both their remaining games, along with Crewe and Notts County, and we draw with Crawley, us and Crawley would go down.

I'll rephrase it. Is this the first time since '97 we have gone into the final day not being safe? Anyway I have suddenly remembered the horror show at Charlton in 2008 so I have answered my own question

Is this the first time since 1997 that we need to win our final game to stay up? I can't remember another season since then where we did. In both 2001 & 2012 we were already down by the final game.

Impossible for us to be safe before next week. Colchester are the only team with a game in hand, Crawley are in the relegation zone and can still overtake us. No Movement18 Coventry 45 -12 52 No Movement19 Crewe 45 -31 52 No Movement20 Notts County 45 -16 50 No Movement21 Crawley 45 -25...

Crawley have won 3 of their last 4 at home and 4 of their last 8.

It's still giving odds on Oldham to go down despite it being mathematically impossible!

Haven't won our last home game of the season since 2006.

We could have done with Crawley winning today, I would rather play a team that only needs a draw to stay up rather than one that needs to win.

Last day then looking like its one of us, Crawley, Crewe, and Notts County. Crewe & Notts County both playing teams that have nothing to play for.

Well it didn't sound like an endorsement of the proposal to negotiate a new deal did it?

Childish comment

Your right, much better to not bother trying.

So wouldn't it be better to qualify those who are already here?

Whom have I discriminated against? You offensive twat!

If immigration was reduced then there would be a labour shortage, which would enable the government to say to these scroungers take one of these jobs or lose your benefits. Immigration is allowing a portion of society to think its acceptable to live life on benefits and sponge off the rest of us.

Who's Gibbert?

You don't need to do anything. Its up to them to prove how you have cost them £60.

Also they can only claim back "damages". They need to prove how you parking there has cost them £60.

The law says that if the signs are not in an obvious place then you haven't entered into a "contract" with the land owner, therefore from the sounds of it it isn't enforceable.