Search results

That headline figure of £125million was nothing more than a headline, think that OSB explained it one time. Can't remember the exact details, but nothing like that figure, just spin really.

And it doesn't make it £15.6million unless Wingy is doubling the CCFC income? Which would then give the same percentage as you did previously!

You could almost say that it is part of a long, drawn-out plan to "distress" the club by charging unaffordable levels of rent in order to get the club on the cheap? I wouldn't myself, but pretty much a mirror image of the club "distressing" ACL in order to get them on the cheap bandied about...

You may have done so in this case, and obviously it would work for FFP, whether club owning Ricoh/ACL or vice-versa, but the same argument has been used many times to belittle the impact that the club does have overall on ACL profitablity(or otherwise). I believe it was you who mooted...

It wouldn't, but a little disingenuous to use the "CCFC" only 20% of turnover" argument when they aren't. One thing that a bid from ACL(if what Stuart Linnell's sources have said is true), may show is that they do need the club there, despite the cloud-cuckoo land talk of many of Rugby clubs...

How much of that £8million business is down to food/drink/advertising/sponsorship associated with the football club? Don't think that the apparent £125 million deal with Compass is based on a couple of concerts a year.

I knew you were a lesbian Tim Fisher!

Not really that, but VOR does go on a bit(as he used to with his pro-Sisu views), but he has never posted as an apostate on here, merely as a newly-hatched anti-Sisu man with no previous liking for them. The second link that NW linked to was only two years ago, even the densest amongst us must...

All your eagles coming home to roost with the turkey twizzlers now.

Best bit is this from Ashdown in response to Voice of Reason on the same thread: "The 'voice of utter bullshit'.........................I&# 39;m sure this fucking guy is schizophrenic, he posted last night how fed up he was with it all!"

Some people have the right to several views, on the same subject!

True enough, and you were one of my bette noirs over on the Telegraph site back in the day because of it! However, though you were an avowed supporter of Sisu/Ranson at the time, you haven't hid the fact, nor tried to go all " more anti-Sisu than thou" like some have, and try to justify past...

When doesn't really matter if somebody has said, in capital letters no less, that they have NEVER written anything in support of SISU.

Bloody imposters, never say NEVER eh? http://www.gmkonline.com/?page=forum&forum_id=6&thread_id=14103

You don't even know his name to be fair. Unless he's doing a joint bid with Bob Hope, which is the only sort of hope we'd have had for years. We're definitely setting up for On the road to...... Walsall.

They are direct quotes from VOR, a few years ago admittedly, but was very certain then that he was right, as certain as he is now that he is right. We were massively in debt then and struggling as a club, maybe a few more should have piped up then rather than waiting til it was too late...

To be fair that's a bit strong. No need for the sexist bit.

That's because you swing the other way, nothing wrong with that at all, would give it a go myself, but couldn't stand the endless musicals and Donna Summer.

Probably the only place where their views on women could be considered progressive.

They lost Rodgers after they got to the Prem, the others beforehand. However Swansea weren't lucky enough to have a "football man" at the helm like we did with Ranson.