Search results

I think it was reported having come up in court.

Plenty of people are on banning orders without having been to prison. I’m not sure why people feel the need to connect the two things. Any club should have the right to refuse his business based on his history. I’d even have a duty of care to other fans. I’m not suggesting indefinite bans...

It doesn’t matter. He is on the front of papers, a club will know who is so have the evidence to ban him if that’s what they wish to do.

This time. His history I believe is littered with violence and racism. At 58 I think you have admit he’s beyond rehabilitation.

There should be a ban for a period of time. Most of the people involved will deserve a second chance, some won’t though. I’m particularly thinking about the 58 year old with a history of this behaviour sentenced yesterday, his mindset is clearly set in still carrying on like this at his age...

I was reading that the right to strike isn’t enshrined in UK law.

Looks like it’s a night for counter protesters. The real silent majority have found their voice.

It was about 60 IIRC. Almost took Russia in a Saturday morning. 4 years later Putin still embarrassing himself on a daily basis failing to take a country nobody expected to last 4 days. The Ukrainians are tough and determined but really the two things are a measure of how awful Putin is at war...

I mean saying it’s because this crime, that crime or another crime was committed isn’t a reason to distract the police from dealing with those crimes by rioting. It’s an excuse, there’s no logic applied in coming to a conclusion that stretching an already overstretched police by rioting is...

Clearly too difficult a question to answer. The answer is of course no. Ask Laurence Fox.

You mean excuses. Reason insinuates that there’s some logic to shitting on your own doorstep. There isn’t.

Do you believe freedom of speech means freedom from consequences? Yes or no?

Has Ukraine confirmed it? Russia has a history of false flag attacks if only for a pro war headline at home.

Must be that 2 tier policing that the snowflakes are crying about at the moment.

Slow news day

That guy is clearly trying to trigger minority communities especially Muslim communities so they turn up ready for a fight so they can then go told you so. They can’t undo their own behaviour so they need to make their “enemies” look as bad to level the field.

Didn’t he reactivate a load of accounts that had been closed due to spreading misinformation, conspiracy theories and hatred? Pretty sure Katie Hopkins and Tommy Robinson had been banned prior to him taking over.

I suspect that won’t stop Tommy if he does actually have an Irish passport as he will have his rights protected under freedom of movement. Interestingly though there is a case for keeping him out of the UK. See Shamima Begum for reference.

I did read but I don’t know for sure if it’s true but part of parliamentary privilege is having access to that type of information. The charge being that as an MP he was in a position to find out the answers to the questions he went on line saying it was right to ask so all he had to do was...

One less burden on the NHS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp8nn63n52jo Oh wait… she’s an NHS nurse. Err… err… err?