Search results

Ffs - why have a go at BG? He's saying it pretty much as a neutral would see things. On another day they could has gone in 2 up at half time. They had the best of the 1st half. We have gone 3-1 up with 1 almighty cock-up & a deflection. Not our best performance...BUT talk about showing character...

You'll never guess who I am either!

"Unsubscribe" as soon as you get confirmation of your order is about the only way.

Cheers folks...will order mine later on. See you there

Hmmm...label (negatively), mock, ridicule or accuse (i.e. Scapegoat) those things & people we do not understand. Says more about you than anyone else.

Watch-it! He'll tie balloons on your wipers otherwise.

Has anyone managed to get tickets via MK Dons or is it just through SISU preferred route?

Which I feel vindicates my earlier comment about PR. Thank you PWKH...& spot on with regard to the Academy!

I would hazard a guess that any individual or business that operates with real transparency, proper ethics & seeks to tell the whole truth in a balanced way doesn't need to spend any money on "PR" types. The more you need to spend on those types...the less you can be believed & trusted.

Did nobody think to call the fire brigade or throw a bucket of water on it? 2-11 is a long time burning.

If ML was there when the offer was made to 1 party that he is representing...common sense would dictate that with his other hat on, at some point in the near future, he'd ask if the offer was open to that party as an option too. If he didn't it suggests that his/their intent was to deliberately...

See, I don't agree with this bit..."If you have no plan you will always fail"...as long as you have a clear definition of what success & failure look like you can succeed purely through focused hard work. Sometimes you can even over-achieve. A carefully constructed plan means you either deliver...

Well some would perhaps defend that & get labelled perhaps equally unfairly as ACL supporters.

Don't confuse a balanced view with "support" (I don't think you're referring to me as on of the other 5 either)

The bit that makes me laugh is "It is not the club's fault we are at Sixfields." He is right of course because despite his club title - his true allegiance not to the club but to the companies that own the club...which he is a director of. So it is not the clubs fault, it is that of HIM & his...

Not aware anyone is defending it from a what's good for CCFC perspective. Nor would I attack ACL for getting top-dollar from anyone willing to pay it. Once the agreement is in place however...any of us would be forced to pay up or ship out. That is what SISU have done...for a good (on the face...

Obviously (as pointed out by others) the deal was signed initially. Subsequently, SISU (under whatever guise at the time) signed up to the agreement in buying the club. Surely you knew that already?

EVERYTHING about CCFC is a worry for those that care enough. Mainly because if your owners can get away with moving us out of our rightful stadium due to a hissy-fit over a previously acceptable agreement...it appears there are no longer any predictables, so nothing is certain.

Well they can just get out of toon...I mean town!

I was more thinking...we ARE definitely play-off calibre at present, & as things stand...if we can keep the team together or even strengthen in January - reigning in 20pts might yet be achievable for an automatic place!