Search results

Did he? So what?

That was literally his entire stated aim

Learn the difference between disagreement and cancellation

Yes it is. You can say whatever, I can criticise you for it. That is precisely what free speech is.

Apart from a single response, at no point have I tried to stop people posting. You’re confusing disagreement with cancellation

Fair comment. Post what you want. I reserve the right to disagree

Victim blaming

WTF are you on about? I support everyone’s right to speak freely

If someone is incited to violence because a man has expressed his opinions, who is to blame? The person who has expressed their opinion? Or the person who has committed violence?

You can’t get out of that mindset can you? THIS IS THE PROBLEM You’ve picked a bunch of things you personally disagree with, so have decided that he somehow had less right to speak his opinions than someone you agree with Do you support the fundamental principle that people should have the...

Just say you cant understand the concept of equivalence. It would’ve been easier.

You’re wrong. His whole intention was to encourage debate. Use words, not emotions to discuss things. Do you disagree with a single word of what he says here:- "When people stop talking, that's when you get violence. That's when civil war happens because you start to think the other side is...

What’s the relevance of it then?

Jo Cox thought MPs safety was worth being risked for constituents to get the chance to speak to her in an informal environment. Guess she paid the price for that too

He’s at fault for that is he then?

What a disgusting thing to say. Jo Cox had views unpalatable to some people. Charlie Kirk had views unpalatable to some people. Unless you’re willing to support their right to equally speak their unpalatable views, then you’re the problem Because let’s be absolutely clear. The problem...

The point is no one at all brought up Jo Coxs opinions immediately after her death. Her attack was rightly seen completely unprovoked and unjustified. People on her have brought up Charlie Kirk’s opinions immediately after his death. Now that is at best irrelevant, or at worst looking like an...

And there we have it.

Is exactly the same. The only difference is Jo Cox had opinions you personally agree with, and Charlie Kirk didn’t

Same as Charlie Kirk then