Search results

Think that Michael has been used by people who should know better. Don't think that anybody doubts Michael's dedication to KCIC, and has had some spectacular successes with some of his campaigns. Obvious choice for a (generally) non-partizan figurehead that pretty much everybody could get...

"He's so vain, he doesn't realise this post is about him.."

Michael sseems a really nice bloke, but do fear he, and kcic being used a Trojan Horse by those who already have very good experience of fucking the club at least once before which led to the bunch of shysters that we have in charge now.

Sound like my perfect date to be honest.

That's right, delivered on Wednesday morning, decision by Friday. To think people accused them of not doing enough due-dilligence when they originally took over the club eh? They must be idiots.

I think it may take the combined deductive reasoning of Sherlock Holmes, Poirot, Miss Marple, Maigrait and Kurt Wallander to get to the bottom of that mystery. Who is that Masked Man?

Because they don't exist?

I'm sure that Richardson made quite a few quid out of the land somehow.

I know, 84% can't do basic arithmetic, really makes my blood boil. Blame the teachers myself.

Wouldn't it be a genuinely "rent and matchday costs free" offer if there was no charge for the under 5000 crowds, but then the KCIC group picked up all the costs and rent for any crowds over 5000? Got a feeling that this offer as it stands is the wriong way round?

Makes you wonder ACL didn't let the club stay on a three year contract "whilst the new stadium was being built" doesn't it really? Three years guaranteed, and with no real likelihood of a new stadium being built would more than likely have been there in perpeptuity.

To be fair, nothing has ever stuck to either of them.

It'll be Teflon.

Wash your mouth out!

Those car boots make more money than i thought! That'll be Teflon Joe then.

To be fair, the articles from 1999, all seemed to be saying that "work will start in the next few weeks/months" on decontamination, obviously never started at all. Forgot about this article by Neville Hadsley from WSC about the whole fiasco, probably worth a thread on it's own to be fair...

Why sign Heads of Terms if you're immediately going to do something different? Not shaking anybodys hands again just in case i end up married to them as it's binding or something.

Oh Christ, I'd have been around Southam around that time. Though never a Young Farmer, tory cunts.

Well you get what you pay for, expect the Higgs barrister did it for nothing so he wouldn't rip off a children's charity.

It's strange how Heads of Terms being agreed(and the day after the council working in total opposite to them) can be said all the time to be not legally binding, yet a handshake is?