Search results

I didn't ask for it but I quite like the dialogue Brody has with fans. Doesn't make me thick, it doesn't make anybody thick. You really need to chill out a bit.

Hi Torchy! I've now heard the King rumour from 4 different sources. They do need strikers.

I think he's being sarcastic! Think it's come from the Westwood to Sunderland thread?!

This isn't reported anywhere else and it's in the daily star! Good luck to him if it's true though.

Offend me? I'm not offended, I just think you wouldn't be complaining if these stories hadn't come out. Everything's better in hindsight. Like I said, the board can't win, you really can't see that you're in the minority that didn't want greater communication with the fans?

The whole of the Birmingham City team have been struck down with Hepatitis B - anybody joining them "gets it"....

From what I understand they go on past written word of what King and his agent has said. I hope it doesn't come down to that and this is just tabloid mumbo jumbo.

I do have to say as well that a verbal agreement is legally binding, although harder to prove than a physical document, obviously! I think a lot of this talk is really just that, talk. It's just a bit too convenient that we hear nothing for ages and then as soon as he's reportedly verbally...

Sky are no better than the tabloids - the amount of "nothing" stories on SSN is ridiculous! But I'd rather not see this story anywhere.

I forgot to say that, although I wasn't one of those asking for more transparency and taking the ethic of what will be will be, I've also enjoyed reading what Brody has written and other snippets of news from the boardroom.

This has got way off point, my point was that football fans can't have it their own way all the time. Transparency of behind the scenes goings on was asked for - not by myself, not by you, but by a hell of a lot of others - and that has been shown by the new board. For a majority of Coventry...

That I can't disagree with!

A wider audience than 200 million people?! You probably mean a more concentrated audience yeah? Thing is, it's not just Coventry he tweets about.

I quoted you because your message said the club shouldn't have said about verbal agreement. They can't win. And then you quote me and talk about dumb Coventry fans. Articulate your sentences better and you might get more valid replies for your self-alleged superiority over these "dumb" Coventry...

Look at what I said. Did I say I asked for every piece of news behind the scenes. No, I didn't. What I said was the fans have asked for it. The board have listened. Now some fans don't like what they're hearing in the media and they change the rules. So before going off on one at fans like...

Unconcerned?! How about have no money and can't do anything about it so what's the point in stressing about it. Unless you have a few million quid you'd like to pump in what do you think "concern" is going to achieve?!

Hah, no worries!

Fans ask for more communication and then twist things so they can moan. Brody said King had "verbally agreed", nothing about actually signing. He's trying to add transparency to behind the scenes goings on as has been asked. No wonder most boards keep their fans in the dark, it's just not worth...

Yeah, The Mirror has said that but there's still nothing concrete there.

Why? The fans have asked to be kept up to date with everything. When they communicated that Thorn had verbally agreed a contract nobody batted an eyelid. You can't go round asking for one thing and because you don't like what you hear start changing the rules. It just doesn't work like that.