Search results

What he said.

Loved the new version of the Sky Blue Song - "Tottenham or Chelsea, SISU or anyone They shan't defeat us........"

From the two games that I saw (Shrewsbury and Wolves), I had Thomas as my MoM on both occasions. I was a bit dubious about Clarke in the Shrewsbury game but thought that he was much better against Wolves and that he really seemed to have settled into the role.

True, but I guess the point is that the statement that it would make would outweigh the "damage" to NOPM. Won't happen anyway - Orient away is nailed on :)

You could just have said that you didn't want to answer the question (again).

That is a very narrow view that (deliberately?) ignores the bigger picture. We had a glimmer of hope this week that there may be the first moves towards talks. We could have had TF on CWR saying that he wanted to engage ACL in talks, instead we got more legal action. Do you think that...

Did I say that my wife believes that? You must refer me to the post. However, she does not have a great deal of faith in many of her fellow JPs or the time given to scrutinise cases or indeed 100% of the evidence of the boys (and girls) in blue. Incidentally, if your clever niece is doing...

That's where it's going to end up Robo. If you don't believe that, where do you think the cost will end up?

If they're one and the same, then by definition it must be CCFC's too.......

Many thanks for the acknowledgement of my wisdom - you're obviously a better judge than I thought :) I'd be guessing too, but with a wife who's a JP and many friends who work in the law, my confidence is well below yours. If you must have numbers, I'd say that you'd have to be a nailed on...

Then your assumption is as misinformed as your judgement of those odds.

Then you're a very strange person or you have a faith in the judicial system that is not shared by any lawyer that I have ever met.

I wouldn't be surprised if SISU have threatened legal action (how can I put this?) more than once in recent months.

I'd have thought the answer was pretty obvious. (To avoid disruption and costs if you're struggling.)

The article in the Telegraph reads exactly that the application was made today.

So in a week where ACL and the Council have made (albeit tentative) steps towards initiating/suggesting talks, you think that SISU going to court (again) "is a good thing"? I had been getting the tiniest bit of optimism that things might be resolved, but that's now been killed. You have to...

I wouldn't agree with "stooge" or "radicalised", but I believe that there has been a change of tone and a degree of "unimbalance".

Given our recent record on local away games, it does seem rather odd. Perhaps too large a following would be too embarrassing?

And vice versa. It was ever thus.

I'll bet the US secret service were bugging it (they seem to be bugging everything else) - wonder if we could get hold of a tape?