Search results

Didn’t he play the full 90 at Wimbledon?

That’s a fair comment. I just think he’s a good player that has that ability to make things happen but he needs to do it more often. Some right over the top reactions at both ends of the spectrum, I agree

He wasn’t poor though. He still performed well in some games but you’ll never change your mind as you had it in for him from the second he signed. Clueless

So were Kane, Walker and Waghorn, he contributed much more than them. He’s a scapegoat when there’s no need. He will never win over some people

He wasn’t poor at all. He contributed to us finishing 5th especially when O’Hare got injured. Could he contribute more? Absolutely but calling him poor is a terrible take

But he’s played in every pre-season game and featured in every game this season . He should easily be up to speed

Their team looks decent though to be fair

Why won’t Saka last 90 mins?

Am I now classed as ITK?

Palmer was made a scapegoat by some from the minute he signed for us

Decent game of football this

And he’d be their best player

Stop panicking

Literally no one has said that

Eccles, Sheaf and Kelly would do a job defensively but we would severely lack a creative spark

I’m not bothered either way but if people want to talk about him that’s up to them. I won’t call it a ‘wankathon’, if you’re not interested then don’t read/contribute to the thread. It’s simple

Probably the same source that told him Vik was signing a new contract

Not at all, just bored of sanctimonious judgemental twats criticising others for taking interest in a players career.