As I say, educated guess. Unless you’re scoring or assisting tons of goals or a player like Alex Scott who’s really young and seen as a top prospect, that’s about the going rate I’d guess for a championship player that’s good but not a standout
MVE is quick, he was the quickest in the Dutch league. Jack Clarke, who is no slouch, didn’t sprint past him once. In fact MVE defended superbly yesterday. He’s a work in progress but I think he’ll turn out to be class for us
He supports a team that haven’t scored a goal all season, hardly a fine judge.
Typical clueless city fans writing him off already. You all did the same with Gyokeres, McNulty etc
He had so much time to pick his spot and hit it at the keeper. Godden’s was a half chance because it came to him quickly and had to hit it first time, making it a harder chance. I have eyes and I know what is a good chance and what isn’t.
But according to one poster on the the match thread ‘The XG says Wrights weren’t a decent chance’ I guess Robins is wrong as well then @Terry Gibson's perm . Clueless
Some absolutely clueless individuals on this thread. We weren’t shit, we weren’t great. On another day the performance would have been just enough to sneak three points.
Simms looked better and some of the attacking patterns were encouraging. Defensively we were rock solid. You should always...
Well Simms and Wright should have scored. Godden had a half decent chance and Palmer should have done better after he beat a few and created a chance for himself