Search results

Well, you should be using the exposure to promote the podcast now. Good luck with that, will give it a go. Should ask JJ on your podcast. 🤣

That's awkward. 😳

Hope we don't get too many loans in. The balance was about right last year, only really had Walsh & O'Hare as loanees who were regulars. Obviously had Watson as cover early on, and McCallum became a loan later in the season but was ours to start. Two or three would be about right I guess.

To be fair, I got bored of reading after the first page and skipped to the end so may have missed some of that. People can say what they like on Twitter. It shouldn't be policed. Players are probably best served ignoring it rather than reacting. Hope he uses it as fuel, and like any true...

In fairness, plenty of people do that with the Season Ticket Fund. The guy is on Facebook, I asked him a while back what was happening on there and he said the order had been placed. I didn't contribute, so not that bothered but maybe people should check with him on there what is happening...

That's kind of what pre-season is for.

Why has one guys dumb comment on Twitter got 7 pages on here? 🤯

Wow, that defending. I know it's pre-season, and we're missing Rose, but is anyone else concerned about the amount of defensive mistakes we've been making? The way we've been defending against lesser opposition we'll need to be scoring 5 a game in the Championship.

Got a link?

Property developer objects to property development. "Yeah, but this one's near my house".

I think there's hope still. Whether something can be sorted for this season, who knows.

I guess the hope was that they could find compromise. I think there is compromise there somewhere, but both sides need to move their position a little.

There have been conversations. Hopefully get something more formal at some point. Sometimes think it'd be more likely to get an open conversation with Vladimir Putin.

Well, yeah, they won't have to pay anything if the EU side with CCC, obviously.

Would make it difficult to enforce the remediation (i.e. what Wasps would have to pay to CCC).

It would 100% mean Wasps would have to pay the difference between what they paid and what the EU think they should pay. No ifs, no bits, even if it bankrupts them. There is no leniency.

New sponsor to be announced in the coming days. Dragging it out.

We can leave (with EFL approval), but there is a cost to do so (and it's not cheap).

I think, taken in isolation, the value paid and the value of extension aren't unreasonable. I think the argument being made in The EU complaint is that they can't be taken in isolation, and that the lease extension was agreed prior to the sale and therefore should've formed part of the...

Would maybe feel a bit templatey though if they did that.