Search results

That sounds low to me - where’s the data from?

I think it’s reasonable to question the deal when King’s been ranting for months about needing to squeeze out every last drop of revenue from the fans.

Can we ask for some insight on the process by which King of Shaves was selected as our primary shirt sponsor, and how competitive their offer was in comparison to previous sponsors?

Congrats on predicting it would be Coventry Building Society all along, great stuff

You’re looking for a massive K-hole?

It is undeniably funny that our summer-long search for a major brand to sponsor our shirt has ended with us landing on….the owner’s brother. I somehow doubt he’s paid a fortune for the opportunity, but even if he has it’s basically robbing Peter Will to pay Paul Doug.

We also remember when you claimed that two other nationally recognised brands were going to be the shirt sponsor, neither of which has come to pass, but you’re still claiming victory for having predicted it anyway

Actual LOL

I do need some help understanding why you were claiming as recently as Wednesday that you’d had inside intel that CBS were the shirt sponsors, when they are actually only sponsoring the back?

ChatGPT gets stuff right some of the time doesn’t it?

It’s a Silence of the Lambs/Hannibal Lecter reference

£500,000 could buy you a lot of paintball sessions and Costa coffees

I’d take £500,000 for him in a heartbeat.

Does the Andrew Tate Defence Fund not fall under that category?

You reckon?

Shame the bet never happened, I’m sure the Andrew Tate Defence Fund could have really used that £250.

Could do with asking DK for some clarity on his recent comments re: who will fund investments to club infrastructure, and how that relates to todays reference to profits made on the Gyokeres sale.

It won’t affect transfer negotiations one bit - unless we’re dealing with a particularly gullible/naive club. It’s only been included in the club statement at all to manage fan expectations really.