Search results

Appointment due to be announced later today according to CT.

Victoria Wood isn't it?

I'd also point out nowhere have I said it IS viable. I've asked the question IF. It's up to you to decide IF you think it is. If you don't, fair enough. If you do, fair enough. It's an internet football forum poll, maybe chill with the officious thing. It's informal. Orrr, you could make your...

Erm, no I didn't! I've said this isn't for ranting, which was obviously a lost cause. Reading - another life skill

Haha, for a forum poll?! Get real mate. You're miffed because the wording, you think, provides the reader with too little information to make an "informed decision" and, therefore, in your opinion, biasing the votes on the "yes" side - which actually goes against your opinion so you're crying...

See, you've just said you don't think it's financially viable. Therefore, under the question I've provided, you should probably tick no. You got there in the end. And I've realised why you're making such a fuss.

You know what would be easiest then? If you don't think the polls any good, just don't post on it? It's fairly simple.

I'm not writing a journal entry with the results. I'm confident most people are taking a sensible approach to what viable means and they know the circumstances won't change anytime soon.

Well for a start I haven't said it would be better in every way? Why do I need to give an example? Most know what's going on. I haven't said in a perfect world etc, so nothing would change ownership-wise, council-wise etc etc. make your own mind up.

Have a look at the poll. I'd say people aren't convinced. It boils down to whether they also think the Ricoh is viable, whether they think wasps will move on at some point and if it's worth waiting it out. There you go, a couple of things for you to think about.

Christ, it's about thinking for yourself. I'm not going to write every detail. So what if viable means something different to everyone, it's meant to be ambiguous. I think most people realise though that viable, in this case, means close enough to the city to not make much difference. Like I...

See statement above. Not thinking for yourself is poor, in my opinion.

That's the point. It's your opinion. You make up your mind what viable is. I'm not here to bottle feed you.

I think if I were to choose players since we dropped out the Prem I'd go for Thompson, Safri and Mifsud. But they're nowhere near my favourites ever

Froggatt - nice one, forgot about him! Such an exciting player. Nicky Summerbee deserved shooting for that.

Dublin or Huckerby for me. Together they were a great partnership.

"There were many"... That doesn't really say much. We didn't own HR. Richardson sold that in 97 or 98, when there was a chance to expand and renovate it. I think most, before HR was sold up, would probably have wanted that. However, we were never given that choice. So are we not just on about...

Who begged to leave HR?! It's a silly comment. Mainly because it's a throwaway remark trying to firm up your own opinion.