Search results

They don't want to be tenants under ACL, they've stated it's the trust issue they have which may hinder it.

Is it really though shmmeee? Because that won't work even if that was the case according to Ann Lucas?

I think this talk of it having anything to do with Sisu is ridiculous frankly.

Maybe the Trust could ask them.

Well then we must rely on Tim Fisher and Labovitch and they have both worked wonders so far... I still stand by that Sisu would not return to a tenancy agreement.

Like I said if there was a genuine fault with the process that Appleton made during the Admin I am sure ACL would have acted by now as any issue would have been a black hole.

It's all good quoting what Tim Fisher says Gent, but as I asked Duffer if they were going to back track on the rent deal why not do it already once they knew things weren't going as they hoped, it's not like they're accustom to rent. Are you sure that will happen?

The Council paid the money to Yorkshire Bank and effectively became ACL's lender, sorry for not making that clearer I thought it wasn't news and common knowledge. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am not ignoring it but it is blindly obvious that Sisu will not return to a tenancy agreement, if that's not clear then why not return up until now when the Tim Fishers predictions were proved to be as wide as America? Unfortunately the Ricoh is only relevant as long as there is way Sisu can...

That is Sisu's claim and the probably the thesis of there whole JR, I agree the whole thing was mess I was hopeful but could never see anyone but Sisu walking away with the Club and that isn't because I believe they were underhanded just simply because they could offer more on the table. Sent...

Because there is no case I would assume.. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Absolutely I agree with that stance James, but I am sure there are many posters on this forum who believe Mr Appleton didn't perform his duties well enough. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You mean post #144 Duffer ;)

I am sorry but for the right or motive not, invading the pitch as a spectator is a banning order, I'd like to sign it, but unfortunately I cannot see this young man being granted any sympathy during his hearing.

Duffer Tim Fisher recently stated they will not return to the Ricoh under a tennancy agreement because they cannot trust ACL, telling me there is an offer for them on the table to return as tennants for better or worse is irrelevant.

James I don't disagree with that first bit because you're bang on, Sisu should have discussed it previously and brought those re-negotations on the rent out into the open, if then ACL had said no I wouldn't blame Sisu for how they acted. With regards to the Administrator would it have made a...

Unfortunately as you mentioned Duffer it's one sided, yes it could have been threatened, but easily it could be manipulated words.

Maybe so, but there was no reason why he couldn't of purchased the Arena from ACL before the deadline final offer was needed by this is my point.

Yeah great form thanks, the loan from Northampton Council isn't to Sisu though is it? It's to Northampton Town, plus the loan or "state aid" from CCC wasn't to our Club it was to a bank, two different scenarios, it's like trying to compare a Boot and a Sandle when considering if they will give...

Let's say PH4 had obtained the Ricoh before the Admin saga began. So when it comes to making a serious offer during the Admin saga we had, one bloke who owned nothing (PH4), One company that owned the Club and no ground (Sisu), if PH4 had owned the Ricoh during those negotiations I think things...