Search results

Counter to that is that selling all 3 at the same time may cause a worse fan reaction, and the turnover would create greater risk.

I don't think it's far off though unfortunately.

Yeah, exactly. I really don't want to go back to the days of constant Sisu Out chants. It's no fun for anyone.

I think at least £8m plus add ons.

I'd go with an O'Hare replacement plus either a defender or young defensive midfielder (Kelly replacement).

I think £8m I'd be happy with (just about). Let's hope it's closer to that. As you say, reinvestment is a must.

If it's true then as a minimum need to bring in 2 players. One to replace and one to further the squad, otherwise what is the point.

I don't think it will be to be fair.

Think if we got £10m people would understand (particularly with some reinvestment). £6m is just selling under market value. They signed a league one player for £4m FFS.

I just think if you're going to sell your best/most popular player you have to maximize value, otherwise it's going to cause trouble as soon as results aren't good.

Don't think Forest will sell.

Which isn't good enough if we sell O'Hare.

Assume there's an expectation that money will filter back to Sisu at times. I think the balancing the books is more around paying EFL loans, and covering lack of sales over last couple of years. Makes it all the more important to achieve maximum value so we can reinvest. Will be disappointed of...

I think if we keep our main players we can. If O'Hare goes then will likely go backwards unless they have a gem up their sleeve. Will need to spend either way.

If we do actually sell O'Hare for £6m there isn't much balance to have.

She won't be making decisions on transfers.

Stringy ham.

Yeah, £6m would be very poor. Back to selling below value out of desperation if true.

If he goes it isn't because someone has held a gun to his head. If he signs elsewhere it's because he wants to do it.

Way too little if true.