Search results

Sisu have demonstrably shown that they are: 1) Untrustworthy 2) Have no interest in football or the sporting fortunes of the club. 3) Have no understanding of community and how important that is in relation to the fortunes of the club. Given that a leopard cannot change its spots it would...

AGREED! The CET has performed lamentably over the tenure of Sisu. They never interpret events with any incisiveness, worthwhile opinion or intelligence. They are just awful and have, in no small measure, contributed to the mess the club is in due to their complete inability to get to the truth...

You're right. The professional bodies should be seen to do something but their largely inept and toothless. Money rules and tv applies its own rules to suit. A recent case was the k.o for the cup final. Until football grows some balls and earns a bit of integrity and respect no one is going...

:jerkit: ....and that'd involve supporting the manager too, you know?

His first goal was better, both classy mind. http://soccer-portal.org/goal-of-the-day/7348-cisse-goal-v-chelsea.html :claping hands::claping hands::claping hands:

But he probably knows what tactless means.

Excellent view from an outsider, shame on the BBC today who couldn't be bothered today.

Add to all that is the constant acknowledgement from opposing managers that Thorn has done as well as anyone could; Alladyce, Holloway, McDermott, etc etc. Alternatively you could take the word of Daffy. MMM, you do a good job pointing out the obvious but it's a waste of effort.

....a bag o wind.

Haha, so there goes another "justification" for Sisu stringency. Complete bollox more like.

Mmmm,? or by lack of confidence in their (RR and Hoff) judgement.....which could, in turn, stem from their ignorance and arrogance.

Are you on hols. Or a tax exile? Either way that's a good post, is it raining?

Bang on. That was a pivotal moment. Boothroyd should have been backed right then.

The point is that these were considerable assets that could have earned Sisu money and bought them time. At which point after joining the club did they decide to leave? Anybody with any acumen should have made this a priority and earned Sisu a wedge. This is so obvious. Turner is another...

Certainly it is an assumption - and hardly an unreasonable one - that a sporting club should have ambition to succeed. Sisu have no ambition whatsoever. This IS the problem.

The failure to secure contracts on assets like Westwood and King certainly coming home to roost. Sisu's ineptitude even extends to them looking gift horses in the mouth. Idiocy.

Haha, brilliant!! All we need now is that brilliant economist Twatkins to come on and bleat "you can't spend what you don't have"

They are a shadowy, indistinct bunch ill suited to the world of football and the unique way that depends on a parochial, highly visible and passionate community. They are better suited to the world of double-speak, subterfuge, boardrooms and pen-pushing. It is an ill-conceived relationship which...

I've implied nothing. My post refers to Sisu and their corrosive and divisive tenure. Read what I say and stick to what's salient. The club is at a crossroads. Do we want to continue with the strategy of a a downward spiral of lies and ever diminishing returns? Or do we want to build...