Search results

We paid a few for him, but you're missing the point a little. The point is that if we pay 400k for a younger development player, that is more the level of player we'll get.

If it is, I highly doubt it's all up front. Headline figures rarely are. Will include add ons for appearances, goals, etc.

400k on someone to develop at this level would probably get you a Tavares.

Need to start looking over our shoulder a bit towards the relegation zone.

We need more than 2 more players if we can't make subs.

Assume he didn't give a red?

Waghorn on the bench for Huddersfield. Kane starting for Charlton.

Touch the ball or stop an opponent from touching it.

Think it's a bit early to say to be fair. Think Kane was always going to go regardless. I like Waghorn but it's not worked out this season for him. Suspect he was one that Robins was referring to when talking about players needing to look outside of CCFC. There's nothing to suggest these...

Don't think our system ever really suited him. Do Huddersfield play a front three with wide players? If so, could see him having a decent spell.

Wouldn't read too much into January transfer window either way. Difficult time to do business. It's probably more about what's available.

Suspect it's satisfying the Sisu debt.

It can always get worse. That's not to say that it will.

Hope we can make a couple of permanent signings. Got a few loans now already.

Short term, I'd imagine so. It probably suits him anyway tbh.

What's a matter with you? Gotta no respect.

McNulty?

Also, wanted by Rangers.

2 red card suspensions then not played last 4 games, so either lost his place or has had a niggle (one of those games he missed due to a back injury, other 3 on the bench, so could be that injury that's kept him out the lineup).