Search results

CCFC has a prospect for returning to the Ricoh according to Tim Fisher, we haven't heard from anyone at ACL, surely a statement on there position is due?

I disagree. Anything is possible but it needs motive to do something about it, whether there is any I am not sure, but I think if a deal was put in place that could at long term ownership of ACL then then club would be over it.

There is something motivating the need to push Baker out the door, what that is, I am sure we will never know.. But a player who scores 25 goals in two seasons from Midfield and assists with half as many goals is a player we should be keeping..

You know that's not what Steve Waggott said or the intention of my post, yes NTFC are responsible for repairing the property however CCFC are allegedly making a gesture as CCFC are aware of the need to maintain the condition of the pitch, maybe it wasn't even asked for and CCFC did it off their...

Did you read what you wanted to read Shmmeee? I clearly stated that everyone think that the Ricoh is clearly the best option, me included as I stated in another post, however the Club have to be proactive in this instance if the Ricoh return doesn't happen, what is wrong with that?

That's not something I disagree with DTD, but what is wrong with the Club being proactive just in case it doesn't happen? A virtual irrelevance? I think that virtual irrelevance you are referring to is revenues that could entice CCFC back to the Ricoh for the long term.

No doubting that Reg, but while a deal isn't agreed with ACL it's nice to see that the Club are being pro-active in there preparations.

I know everyone wants and believes that the Ricoh is the better option - including myself! - however we have to bare in mind that if we can't negotiate a deal with ACL to return to the Ricoh then the Club must plan for the season ahead, I actually approve that the Club is still using foresight...

Is it just me or is what Steve Waggott stated justifiable?

Bitching about it on Social Media will not help his cause.

Isn't every transfer subject to approval?

A lot younger than he is now.

That's a load of bollocks quite frankly. Wilson and Clarke fitted into the system perfectly, they scored goals but they were sold for completely different reasons than SP's system and you know it. I can understand accepting the offer for Wilson as it was a lot of money, Moussa had no interest...

I am just highlighting that not all things said in the Club shop are totally untruthful, however we find know truthful this one is..

I disagree with that! Someone told me in the Club shop that the new Away Shirt would be in White and then it was a rumour, but it turned out to be correct.

I used to live a stone's throw away from the Mem, I'll be there.

Haha!! Although I used to play as a striker, with my dodgy knee's I can barely kick a ball nowadays without doing damage to myself! I really should have used a comma in that sentence!

That's not what it says at all Jack and you know it, we know that CCFC can't compete with the wages that being offered to players in the Championship for instance. I am sure that if Marcus Tudgay was to sign for the Club, Tudgay would have to take at least a 60% perent wage drop, but he joined...

I personally think it has more of a chance of.......... I don't want to jinx it! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think if we have a real good go then there is no reason we can't get a victory from the fixture. I am going with 1-0 City, Tudgay to score. My lineup would be: Allsopp, Phillips, Clarke, Johnson, Pugh, Swanson, Fleck, Thomas, O'Brien, Miller, Tudgay Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk