Search results

If the website and club shop portal are owned by CCFC Limited surely it is illegal for Timmy and Holdings to have control of it?

Surely it has to be a resurrection of Coventry Sporting Club who played at Kirby Corner until they went out of business. Played in Red and Green (Cov's City Colours) but in no way a replacement for City. Wish them luck though.

I totally agree with this but the problem is that it is impossible to manage. For example a stooge can be put forward as a club owner or director and must pass fit and proper, but in some cases the actual power and investment may sit with someone who is wholly unacceptable holding the actual...

If that did happen they would not be hanging on as they would be out and the agreement for a further payment would be in place with them having zero impact on the club going forward. So not too bad in the circumstances other than the fact that they have invested next to nothing and have earned...

So lets have a look at what Tim "Slimy but Dim" Fisher had to say; 1. The club is not far sale. I think he will find that the Administrator (yes Dim that is the one that you appointed who actually runs the club now) put the club up for sale over a week ago and has numerous bids. Including one...

Fantastic start to the new era

If he is on our side we are fucked

The answer is in your first few words "If what Tim says is true". Can you actually remember him ever telling the truth?

Not really as the bid would be to the Administrator but any deal to play at the Ricoh or buy a part of it would have to be agreed with ACL. So does that mean that we have 5 serious bids and SISU.

Any bid at this stage would have to be indicative until due diligence had been completed when the deal would be finalized.

There is a legal precedent for this. The taxman has tried and tried again to get the courts to rule that the Football Creditors rule (A Football League rule) should not stand over the insolvency laws but every time the courts have ruled in favour of the Football League. It would be the same in...

Never under SISU

There is one party that is very quiet in this saga and that is the PFA. Surely if a whole squad of players is liable to become redundant they should be having a lot to say, or have they been told more than we have?

Do you have £1 in your paypal account if so think your bid would be welcome.

If the football club is CCFC Ltd and SISU try to claim monies from transfer of players that would be third party trading which is against FL rules, so not even sure they could claim income from transfers and do you really think they would carry on paying the office staff and coaches once they...

Maybe Dim wants it to walk his dog on now he doesn't have a football club to ruin.

Fisher's meeting may as well be with the 8 interested parties to buy the club. He could auction his shares in Holdings to the highest bidder. Does he not see what a prick he is making of himself.

The only thing the Administrator thinks a new buyer would have to negotiate for is the players contracts and this frivolous claim of beneficial ownership. So if the new owner laughs at the beneficial claim and says tell you what SISU keep your players we will get a new squad that leaves SISU...

So if it comes down to CCFC Ltd being granted permission to play in League 1 and players contracts with Holdings are deemed ib breech so they can all walk foc, which ones would you sign? For me; Murphy, Christie, Adams, Baker, Fleck, Thomas, Jennings and Clarke. Then get stuck into the out of...

Maybe the buyer should ask SISU to surrender their shares in holdings free of charge. What was good for them is surely ok for a new buyer "in the interest of the club"