Search results

& i go along with Nigel on the C & W phone in, when he stated, with emphatic feeling & heartfelt vigour, 'the gloves are off'

& FFS as regards, no one defends sisu, hang on a fucking minute, there a a minority, on here, who have obviously experienced both a humility & reality bypass

& sbwm i fully understand there are other parties who are complicit, however, may i just point out that THOSE OTHER PARTIES are not, in the opinion of many, at this present time, trying to force the liquidation of OUR club, primarily, imho, because of their gross & devious incompetence, it is...

sorry hobo, 2 turkeys do not an eagle make

there's no doubt, from the many i've spoken with, without sisu, the gates will triple, f'kin great job you've done fishface, in many persons opinions, the most hated man in this city

& fishers comments @ the forum @ the standard club some 4 years ago were 'if i idon't do my job properly i won't get paid, so has he been on benefits all this time ? fit for purpose ? FA & FL get your f'kin fingers out, this mob, imho, are charlatons

& yet there are some total fuckwits, imho, on here who dare to defend them, ffs,

as i suggested on another thread, anyone who owns a business could print off a sign reading, SISU ARE BANNED FROM THESE PREMISES, every little helps

to all intent & purpose, it would appear that monies / support is not forthcoming, if this is the case, who is putting the block on this ? & is this a case of trying to distress ?

anyone with a business, put up a sign, SISU ARE BANNED FROM THESE PREMISES

i clicked like, but i don't like the position we are in, think you have got a lot of things spot on, TM to me seems like a 1 legged man put into an arse kicking contest, our controllers must surely be keeping the mysterious investors at bay, if those investors knew how their money is being used...

let's not come down too hard on the C/Tel people, after all, it would appear that they are up against ......... .......... ........... ............. fill in the words to complete the statement

bip, bop, a bippedy, shoo, n' a fishwipe too, bop bip & bippedy hoy, you sho is on the money joy,

ajs, twas a jest, the situation being like kids in a nursery, however, it does beg the question, how much did it irk otium / sconset / sisu ? what revelations may come next from the Cov Tel fraternity ?

well, the Cov Tel could claim that due to the ban they are unable to practise their trade, hence, loss of earnings, then when sisu come back with a counter claim, then, Cov Tel say 'well you started it', o_O

loss of earnings seem to be a favourite wi the sisu mob

exactly wcsb, i posted this question as soon as the news of the ban came out, so back on track for the thread, who issued the ban ? & why don't the Cov Tel start legals against whoever issued it ?

IN THE NAME OF THE BEAUTIFUL GAME PLEASE ENCOURAGE ALL RIGHT MINDED FOOTBALL FANS TO SIGN

i'm prepared to accept that some people are thankfully willing to accept a dose of reality, a rare & precious commodity these days, thank you GB & agent if i'm correct

imho, we CCFC fans are being forced to continue to suffer the silence from the mystic owners, & imho, the committed christian controller keeps the wall of silence, perhaps to entice someone to err, so that she can take legals for loss of earnings against anyone who dares to disagree with her...