Joy really needs to stop Fisher speaking, every time he opens his mouth it becomes more and more obvious he isn't telling the truth. How blatent a lie do you want than saying ACL won't talk to you a day after ACL have publically said they want the club to stay there and are open to talks?!? He...
I can see them going for Sixfields, apparently their owner is planning to sell up once the improvements have been done. No doubt the 2 clubs will then be merged. FL will claim they didn't want to do it but had no other choice.
what would actually get liquidated tho? it's ltd in admin, according to Fisher holdings have the contracts and a claim for the GS so what difference does it make it they liquidate ltd (other than a possible further points penalty).
pretty sure there is also a rule that says they will only consider a club moving if they have no ground available in their home area, we have the Ricoh sat there ready and waiting!
not very impressed to be honest, should have been a lot stronger statement than that. Am I right in think they have Trust representation on their board?
I can see it happening. According to the Northampton forum their owner is looking to sell once the redevelopment is done. Can see a merger happening. Now we've gone it makes it easy for SISU, they'll just claim they can't purchase a suitable site, can't get planning permission etc. Going on the...
I like you're thinking but they'll probably make you buy a ticket before you get on the coach. SBT should arrange coaches. Imagine more coaches of protesters going than people going to the game.
guess so, I would imagine they're talking to lawyers about their options to recover the balance of the lease but I think they've been outdone here. SISU liquidate ltd, lease is gone, don't have to pay ACL anything as Ltd has no assets - job done.
I find it unbelievable that the FL can even begin to consider an owner fit and proper when they are moving the club out of the city. they also seem to have completely disregarded their own rules just to allow SISU to get away with this.
they've not coming back, they can let the league keep a million or have to fork out 30 million plus on a new stadium. no site, no plans, no planning permission - only way we will ever be back is if new owners take over.
haven't they already transferred out all the assets they want to holdings? sure they'll just liquidate and take another points hit for not having a CVA, not like they care about the football anyway so why would they be bothered about another points deduction.
they might manager 3 or 4K to start with but unless we're having a storming season, which seems very unlikely, I can easily see crowds of under 1K. how many people are going to still make the trip on a Friday night just before Xmas in the freezing cold and snow?
its a law v FL rule situation again. as far as I'm aware you can't legally have a contract to groundshare you would have some form of lease or rental agreement. the FL are the ones that use the groundshare term and they use it to cover all situations where 2 teams are using the same ground so...