Think you may be right on the 0-0.
3-1 is rather optimistic I feel with no striker. Seems like we will go for 1 up front and that 1 either being McShuff or Elliot.
A draw would be great and I too will plump for 0-0.
Yep, Baker's goal then meant Stevenage had to throw everybody forwards and that then allowed DMC the space for the third.
Not sure whether the captaincy or MR or a combination of both has brought out the best in the lad. He is finally scoring goals at last and long may that continue.
Just think some payment can keep the sides talking on relatively decent terms, rather than the way things seem to be turning very sour and with a degree of resentment apparently, based on the language we are hearing from the differing camps.
Well that's the way i am thinking.
ACL a while back did mentioning paying 'some of the rent.' Surely a gesture can be made of some payment to keep some goodwill and prevent any action against the club while negotiations continue.
As I have said many a time, this isn't just about Coventry City, it is about the city of Coventry.
I want the best solution for all parties so that no side loses to the degree that it puts them out of business or prevents them from functioning.
There has to be a compromise surely? It has to...
Would say OSB usually has everything pretty much bang on the money.
Think everyone agrees the best option for City would be for an investor to come in. Whether or not that is ever going to happen or not though, who knows. Could be a long wait.
Obviously success on the pitch will make us a much...
That's alright then, cos on a number of occssions you have mistakenly given me the :facepalm: sign thinking I have meant something else.
I don't trust anyone. Best policy I feel. Business is business!
Wombles song, Wombles of Wimbledon Common.
'Underground, over ground, Wombling free,
The Wombles of Wimbledon Common are we.'
'Half a ground, half a ground, how can it be?
You're fakes and you're cheats, you're Franchise FC.'