Search results

Get More Spiteful.

Beat me to It.

Oh the glamour ,Dagnall will not play!!

The symmetry between what was the rent and what are now Interest charges Is Intriguing ,while owners are entitled to make money from football however,it s hardly helping "The Club" Is It?

He like Linnel are extremely quick to adopt the Fisher Stance that ACL are Irrelevant In trouble and will fail

I came from the polar opposite ,was reading a few posts from when I first joined this site this morning,and have to wonder what changed ,It has purely been the actions of the owners I conclude and there has been a litany .

Maybe we could unite this with taking in a Wimbledon Match ,to show solidarity and a payback for all the money Winkleman got ,not suggesting there was any Hypocrisy in that by the way ,as the message since proves to have highlighted the wrongs of the current debacle. Might expand our numbers...

I remember at the Shrewsbury ground after the game meeting a quite vociferous Individual who thought all those staying away/ In the Trust/On the March were no fans who never went anyway or held St's.

Thats been happening pretty much from the start TBH,more to with the Product used ,either Efflourescence or a Protective Glaze applied.

This Is one area i don't really get around your response to the situation . That you would accept all they are doing /have done In the aim of the Prize ,at whatever cost locally ,I just don't understand why you are not going ,as you undoubtedly are a long term fan who only cares about CCFC.

I think a better Idea would be for the 7-8K that don't go descending on the FA headquarters would get our message over better ,might even get support from other supporters through Supporters Direct .I get what you're saying , but I think the message would get skewed as Tacit approval .NOPM as...

My Hair!!............And a few teeth .........Smithfield ............Tally Ho...........and a little Testosterone.

In all honesty that system was terrific for the first 20, we tore them a new one and with better finishing we'd have been out of sight.

I don't think anything that gets said on here In our desire to try and work out what the hell is going on should be open to a writ ,as In reality we're having the kind of conversation we could have in the Pub or on the Terraces(now there's a laugh).I don't think either that petty childish abuse...

That reports been well thumbed ,but far more than It ever should have.

No Stu Shortfall on Construction costs £31m. £21M. Lease +£10M. council Equity.

2-1 I reckon,bring on an Inside out special a la Leeds UTD style.

The £21M. was for the shorfall in construction costs +£10m. equity ,I thought the same Stu till someone pointed It out the other day.

Coming slightly from the other end of the spectrum ,until the administrations /liquidations are complete has the old lease with ACL actually been discharged . If so was this a motive for ACLs recent offer ,and why SISU steadfastly refuse it ,Is the delay from Appleton aiding SISU from stopping...

That Is a great result. :claping hands::)