Search results

So 4 months after they moved in?

"An act of folly that drove club out of Ricoh" Mr fisher drove club out in his van he hired. Again, why should council securing financial future of Ricoh have anything to do with ccfc? Oh wait, they has to do it as CCFC withheld the rent that put them in that position...

Sisu will claim as fact that the council taking over the acl mortgage was a plan to get new owners of CCFC..... In reality the mortgage buyout has nothing to do with CCFC or about pushing sisu out. They're just sore because the council beat them to it buying the debt.

That labovitch weasel really is a horrible man. Dingy offices? Cheeky c**t. Bloke is a disgrace.

Don't think Leicester reserves would have needed a club shop either, or office space, or IT infrastructure....and everything else that goes with having a football club sit as tenant in a stadium.

Thought the last 'meeting' seemed to suggest they (or at least the chair) didn't want them there? My point being if they are weeded out then the group isn't as impartial/representative as it should be

Whatever anybody's stance is, it is clear that the group supposedly representative of the supporter base put together to have a close link to the club management is clearly in Fisher/ML/Sisu's pocket. Why this is a problem is that it is not accurately representing the views of the fan base at...

Wouldn't give them the time of day.

An open fans forum where labovitch chooses the audience so he can try and expose CCC/acl? Don't think so. Whole thing is a propaganda exercise. Disgraceful.

I'm spotting a trend with this due diligence business and the lack of being able to do it well... Interestingly the new cov blaze coach was on about recruiting new players for next season and rather than looking at ability and stats, he was getting feedback from Facebook and that from their...

Can't help but have a dig can he. Why is it everything he has said there makes me angry and is almost completely the opposite of the truth...

Just read it. Sisu wanted to buy the debt, Higgs share, and councils power of veto. Something made Higgs/acl/CCC twitchy (maybe figured out true intentions of sisu?) so council bought out mortgage instead, which prevented sisu taking over acl. This pissed them off beyond all recognition...

Probably not a total surprise. Ultimately if the clause in negotiations said that if for any reason they broke down sisu should pay, then that would have been the ruling today. Must mean that as in the judgment neither wanted them to succeed then sisu aren't liable. Shame but as said above...

Who wrote this article? Fan zone I take it?