Search results

I can't agree with that. I've defended Vincenti but I thought he was very poor today. I do wonder if we're playing him in the right position to get the best out of him.

how long do you give the others? Biamou has improved, have Beavon and McNulty? If he's improved as much as he's going to then clearly he's not good enough but do you really think he was brought in to be our main goal threat?

biamou has come from non-league so should be afforded more patience than supposed proven league 2 players who are performing worse than he is. It's not difficult to grasp.

you won't be able to pull up any quote from me saying he's brilliant because there aren't any you fucking cretin. Get your carer to read you post 417 to find out what I said about him and stop talking shite.

30 stone?

to be fair it was only his belly, he was standing in the dugout.

so if someone doesn't change a result they can't have played well - give me strength!

that was the one, it looked a pen to me. Ref got the first shout right, definite dive.

Yes, he clearly did to anyone watching but a simpleton.

According to who? That's certainly wasn't my opinion before the game.

he played OK, should have started.

they also had, what I thought, was a decent penalty claim turned down.

Said the same to my mate. We clearly need to recruit in January so wages will need to be freed up somewhere.

he made their centre halves work when he came on and he's getting better. Remember where he came from and give him time. We've got 3 players supposedly proven at this level who are much more of a let down at the moment, McNulty, Beavon and Vicenti.

a corner to this team is about as much use as a throw in in our own half.

the team selection didn't match the tactics. We were hitting the channels early, we should have had Biamou on with either Pontecelli or McNulty. We were heading for a point until Grimmer went off, lost the ball in the middle because we didn't have the out ball on the right and it ultimately lead...

I hope for their sake you're wrong but given the nature of the Oystons you could be right.

to say anything would happen straight away, whether it's the collapse of the economy or the signing of improved trade deals is ridiculous to be honest.

their homes gates matched if not exceeded ours. There were buyers wanting to take over the club but the Oystons refused to sell. Their decision to sell now has been taken purely due to the 31 million they were ordered to pay by the courts this week, nothing to do with any boycott.

I actually think that what hampered Eubank was the fact that he wasn't a natural middle and he had to spend too much time managing his weight before fights. You can't blame him for doing it, if rumours are correct, him, Benn, Watson etc were getting around an £800,000 purse for their fights...