Search results

I'm not saying I disagree with the policy, I'm just pointing out it can also backfire. I'd much rather this than one year deals and loans.

I'm still hopeful one day we will get a storm named that. FOr the irony I hope it's a massive one (as long as no-one gets hurt of course).

In fact the largest percentage of 'payday' is weekly. Lots of poorly paid jobs are still paid in this manner. I'm just pointing out that what's convenient for you may well be very inconvenient for others. So when they complain about the release not matching their payday would you say that...

But with the three year contracts as devils advocate if the signings don't turn out well we're stuck with them for an extended period as I doubt anyone would sign them if they're unsuccessful. So that's the transfer kitty spent and lots of the wage budget tied up for a few years. Having said...

When exactly is 'payday'? I used to get paid 2nd week of the month. Sister gets paid on third Friday. Mate gets paid end of first week of the month once time sheets have been collated and added up.

Someone once said it was a reference to Shakespeare but I don't believe it. 1. Bill's mother lived damn near the same place as Bill, so why not just say Bill's? 2. It seems to have been quite well used further afield so god knows how they could see that far.

I don't either. I'm actually planning on using the betting this season to test a theory of betting against City and see how it ends up. Was going to send a similar idea (not involving betting but ticket discounts) to the club called "Points or £'s"

All from my nan: "I'm a Cov kid with a button on me hat" "I'm not well and no-one will let me be bad" if she forgot something "I've been to bed since then" And she did the posh telephone voice too, but also with strangers in person.

We've released the numbers a bit earlier than usual haven't we? Usually don't expect them until we've played half the friendlies. Just got them out of the way for kit release?

As I've said above, in some alternate reality where they did those things they're still being crucified for some reason or another. There was no right answer for them. Personally I wouldn't have gone in with the Tories.

I reckon its Tiger Feet by Mud

Yep. Short with silly hair.

No that's Hickman - he likes to f*** b******

Have you seen his latest wheeze that the American's took the airports in the War for Independence. He's blaming the teleprompter but even a ounce of history would tell you as soon as that left your mouth it wasn't right.

I'll bet they were itching to steal that car and got a real buzz from it.

No - the coalition raised them of which they were very much the junior partner. Tories wanted to raise them. If was a tactical error, but the main reason the tuition fees went up was the Tories, followed by the LD for supporting in in exchange for an AV referendum.

It's wierd how stuff sticks to some and not to others. Every single party that has gone into government has broken manifesto promises. Difference is that those parties had a majority and so their manifesto's were what they intended to do and didn't. The Lib Dem manifesto was for a Lib Dem...

So what were the alternatives? 1. Form a coalition with Labour. This would've also been seen as a grab at power, but even more undemocratic because the party with the most votes wasn't part of the government. 2. They turn down both the Tories and Labour and they get accused of not being strong...

Northwood? I think we had Richard Wood or Neil Wood possibly at the same time but don't ever remember a Northwood

If Hickman hears there's a 'line' going he'll be mysteriously pulling a hammy to end up in the treatment room