Search results

unless Robins sanctioned it to finance a move for someone else. If that's not the case then I agree. He was just starting to show signs of decent form and it leaves us short on numbers and with a lot of inexperience.

we're definitely short in midfield if this happens.

i work with several Poles, never known a race of people to eat so much beetroot!

I would have said I would never go to the radio 1 weekender, but I'd renege on that for the Belfast line up, very impressive. Cov line up is a bag if shite.

i think there was a sizeable amount who believe that getting away from the EU will benefit the economy. I think the graph I posted proves that. There will also be those who want to stay in the customs union and maintain freedom of movement. And as usual you're making things up to try and prove...

I'd like another midfielder as well. Wasn't overly bothered but the shifts I see Shipley and Bayliss putting in will take their toll. Early days yet but I'm not convinced Barrett and MD will get up to speed too quickly, I may be wrong. Although with Stevenson showing a bit of a return from form...

Agree with you about GDP. It doesn't measure if the growth is fairly distributed or if everyone is benefiting. I think it's also a bit of an immoral measure. Natural disasters add to a countries GDP. A pile up on the motorway can add to the GDP.

I didn't accept any point. People voted for a whole host of reasons. That's why there were several pro leave groups all with different agendas. Do you seriously think that George Galloway wants the same BrexIt as Aaron banks? People bring up the econmy because our enconmy is performing poorly...

I didn't ask the people in my office, they offered their opinion, as those who voted brexit because of immigration did and those who voted remain did whenever we discussed it. If it's not about the economy why is so much of this thread dominated by talk of the economy? Why is the cabinet split...

I'm currently sat less that t10 feet away from 2 people who say the economic s of it and not paying into the EU were one of the main factors. If you think it meant the same thing to 17 million people then you're the one talking nonsense. .

and again, many people claim it wasn't a cultural decision but an economic one. Proving that there is no consensus on what the vote actually meant.

but the team are sisu aren't they?

that wasn't my intention and I don't want to be an apologist for bad behaviour but I also think we need a bit of perspective. Just think some people are trying to focus too much on the negatives, not saying GE necessarily was.

it's not impossible. Unlikely, and would obviously require new owners but definitely not impossible.

no one should have to go to a game and endure chants about their polo shirt.

I can see this being the Friday night game.

Of course we're not as big as them now. But historically we much the same in size. If our positions were reversed we'd be where they are and vice versa. I remember when we were all in the top flight and villa and forest got bigger crowds but everyone else was much the same. We could get to where...

fucks sake mate. A few individuals acted the arse Saturday. It's been discussed and highlighted no let it go and enjoy the result. If you expect 8,000 supporters from any team are going to go anywhere and not have a few dicks misbehave you're deluding yourself. Remember why we only got 8,000...

Great win at the weekend - no post. FA Cup draw thread - no post. Cambridge match thread - no post. Mention of owners - on it like a tramp on a bag of chips.