Search results

you don't point fingers prior to an enquiry, that's why it's called an enquiry not a witch hunt. And whether Corbyn is fit or not to run the country isn't the issue here, it's how we handle a potentially serious international incident. Still not responded regarding the Iraq war, but don't...

interesting tweet regarding the academy. Looks like its long(er) term future could be sorted soon.

the evidence that would be presented to the OPCW who deal with this type of incident in accordance with international convention as I stated last night as No 10 has stated today. We have the support of the other countries because we are following procedure and they are happy to issue a joint...

no. Because he wanted to see the evidence you daft twat. He wanted a proper enquiry which the statement is calling for and for Russian cooperation. If they're found guilty or don't comply then we will have international backing for any sanctions which will be more effective than Gavin...

Are you thick? May has just issued a joint statement with France, Germany and USA basically saying what Corbyn said yesterday you dopey c**t. Salisbury attack: Joint statement from the leaders of France, Germany, the United States and the United Kingdom - GOV.UK

I'd do it just to see the carnage on this board.

I'd go for the Reid option, though he seems to be one of several players in our squad who seem incapable of lasting 90 minutes.

looks in need of it.

he gets bad press on everything including the made up Czech spy bullshit though no doubt you lapped it up.

That's why in post 1668 I said "us, (as in the west)." Obviously the Russians arm their proxy the Iranians and we all take sides in the Sunni/Shia schism. I'd say it's not working out very well, wouldn't you?

us, (as in the West), gave then the green light to spread Wahhabism in return for keeping the oil flowing. We have also given them massive bribes to enable multi billion arms deals, it would be naive in the extreme to think that none of the money or the arms have ended up in ISIS hands. This...

the same that you never answer when I ask you to condemn May for enabling the Sauds to spread the doctrine and arm the terrorists of militant Islam. I've never known a person aspiring to be Prime minister (though he wasn't at the time), protesting on behalf of a terrorist, I've known actual...

I am currently been governed by a party who gave a billion pound bribe to a party with very close links to loyalist terrorists. You may think that's not as bad, I thinks it farcical.

He didn't say anything, does that mean he's wrong about this? George Galloway disagrees with you on this, does that means he's wrong about everything including his fervent support for Brexit?

because, as you well know, you can tar almost any politician with supporting or associating with someone or some organisation which has been involved in violence and murder, often the the detriment of that politicians own country. You know that fine well. Like I said on another post, I can't...

eventually, May initially refused an inquiry because she didn't want to upset the Russians! It concluded that it all liklihood he was killed by the Russians with Putins knowledge.

Yes. Did the Israelis?

what have you got against following proper procedure? Surely if a proper enquiry establishes Russian guilt they have nowhere to hide and the UK can expect unequivocal international support for any sanctions taken?

you really should be embarrassed typing that when you support boris and theresa. And are you saying you don't want the due process followed so the truth can be established? You'd rather trail by tabloid?