Search results

Anyway bored so Moscow now - please Putin more effort tomorrow

So when historians relate behaviours of current leaders to last ones it’s whataboutery - wow Taylor must have a phd in it

lol diversion another lazy cliche I’ve repeatedly asked your view on Wolfowitz and the influence he and successors had on foreign policy - go on chuck another cliche out there

Also whataboutery is such an absurd term - a lazy euphemism to evade debate

I’ve asked you one question 3 times and you’ve made no attempt to answer it

I said my guess. But hey ho

I explained every political party has had associations while in government with people of money. Blair was as corrupt as they come so it’s not a party political point - if we really want to go into the bowels of history minutes were suppressed of cabinet meetings under the stewardship of Ted...

I’ve explained it when I mentioned Wolfiwitz through to Romney sorry I’m not using crayons and doing it again. Believe the opinion or not and seriously if your pointing to the fact it’s 92 and not 88 as some pointy stick told you so it’s not a great start is it

Yes you know Russia and it’s people - I have been and also know many in the uk and their nationalism and devotion and preparation for the worst is beyond what anyone on here who has zero direct experience with Russian culture can ever comprehend

You are morphing into PVA oh and I’m a bit busy now but I’ll start a thread over the weekend and I will have sensible discussions but frankly you’ve clearly no understanding at all here of post communist Russia and the circumstances the west - mainly the us obsession with a Cold War enemy and...

Tell you what I’ll start another thread on this and I’ll give my opinion on this crises and how to resolve it Then actually debate it - no twitter links no dumbass opinions from other sources but actual opinions and then we can have a sensible discussion and those who want to stay in the...

No you are 20 years out of date

So I’m always on the losing side at elections brexit and the continuation of capitalism - how depressing for me

No it doesn’t starving was a euphemism for restrictions Do you have any understanding of the Russian mentality? At the fall of communism the country went into entrenched poverty beyond any scale you’d imagine. It’s a stubborn nationalistic country. Then being starved meant no food for a week...

What are you on about? Genuinely are you on the wind up or stupid?

well a lot as once it controls all the ports abd can prevent movement out of the country sanctions won’t just be starving the Russians and at that point some form of negotiated settlement is likely After all by the end of next week Von de Leyen and her crew will have handed another £2 billion...

My guess is he will seize the capital within the next few days - you?

No point is discussion point one as you have blinkered labour bias I said we should have made Russia an ally not an enemy - are you shocked? Are you sending me to Muswell Hill for a socialist injection?

A question regarding diminishing the standards 😂 you actually have liked posts from an Ira sympathiser and someone whose intellect includes accusations of “chatting whiff” “smoking pipe” and “sitting in your own piss” - you seem to like that standard of debating style so I assume you want me to...

It doesn’t mention gas suppliers and is an opinion piece by an American HI guy who seems to suggest we can end the war by paying Russia for peace Good one